Watches are both objects and habits based on having that object, the least of which is wearing one. This is a new set of watches that run on market time, basically how fast you consume the time, and replenish your supplies. Basically times are bought in stacks of adhesive strips that can be stuck to surfaces, or maybe its candies . Each one has some sort of time significant information on them, and much of that information is based on feedback on peoples favorite times and how the product has been a part of those. In this way a small candy company could possibly take over some aspect of the world. — rcarty, Dec 24 2014

Annotation: If you've ever worn a watch you would know that it is a good habit to wear it all the time because precision time is often required for tasks that require a watch. So there is a connection between time and labor which is done with the hands, so a watch that watches labor can tell you what time it is and where you are but in a novel way that comments on some element of social organization satirically by suggesting that the stage-spaceship analogy differential imply that the world, which they are a metaphor for, imply someone should be acting towards spectacle indicated by the one hand, and acting toward totality indicated by the other hand. You are censoring free speech by nationalist supioriorty thesis applied to the entire domain of interpretation and implying social cause as the main force. You are being nationalist social mediating scrum. No wait that was the other idea. This idea is a comment about advertising in a product that control the times candy or stickers supply chain.

This watch doesn't tell you, it is more like a data point in a deduction.

Your mind can definitely make huge jumps just a pity you don't make sure there are smaller stepping stones following underneath for the rest of us. — wjt, Dec 27 2014 [delete]

//Watches are both objects//

with you so far

//and habits on having that object//

Did you mean, "Watches are objects upon which people base certain habits"? Because that would have made sense.

//This is a new set of watches that run on market time, basically how fast you consume the time//

Time passes likewise for all and death shows at the gate of the rich and poor alike ready to collect time's toll. No one consumes it faster or slower.

//Basically times are bought in stacks of adhesive strips //

So is your idea a watch or is it stickers that have times, such as "10:30" or "that time I went to the dentist"? Because there would be no point to the stickers.

// Each one has some sort of time significant information on them//

This is where I'm completely lost. You're proposing printing "significant information" on stickers. I get that much. But to what end?

// much of that information is based on feedback on peoples favorite times and how the product has been a part of those. //

Not helping.

// In this way a small candy company could possibly take over some aspect of the world.//

Still not helping. You seem to be throwing a dart at a board with words on it. Whatever words you hit, you are mashing together into grammatically correct, yet conceptually nonsensical thoughts. You are then typing those thoughts out here. Why would you do this? I don't know. But if your intent is to communicate something perhaps you should construct a paragraph that is direct, concise, and contains _all_ root and branching ideas in still grammatically correct clauses. — Voice, Dec 28 2014 [delete]

[marked-for-deletion] Doesn't appear to be any understandable idea here. If you can explain your thinking in a way that's generally understandable I'll withdraw the mfd, otherwise this idea will be deleted. — hippo, Dec 28 2014 [delete]

If you've ever worn a watch you would know that it is a good habit to wear it all the time because precision time is often required for tasks that require a watch. So there is a connection between time and labor which is done with the hands, so a watch that watches labor can tell you what time it is and where you are but in a novel way that comments on some element of social organization satirically by suggesting that the stage-spaceship analogy differential imply that the world, which they are a metaphor for, imply someone should be acting towards spectacle indicated by the one hand, and acting toward totality indicated by the other hand. You are censoring free speech by nationalist supioriorty thesis applied to the entire domain of interpretation and implying social cause as the main force. You are being nationalist social mediating scrum.