h a l f b a k e r yThe word "How?" springs to mind at this point.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Have you ever said a word over and over again only to
discover that repetition destabilizes your ability to
pronounce the word correctly?
PLELP is a software application that predicts how many
times you can speak aloud a particular word before you
are
unable to pronounce it correctly.
You
enter a word and the software spits back an
estimate
of how many repetitions you will get too before you are
unable to pronounce correctly.
I suppose the equation could be based on how many
syllables and letters are in each word.
Ultimately here is a software application that supplies a
legitimate reason to repeat the same word over and over
again in public.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
[+] and the add-on that predicts how many times you can say the word before it starts sounding foreign or nonsensical to you. (what, that only happens to me ?) |
|
| |
Yes, it only happens to you. |
|
| |
PLELP-PLELP-PLELP -PLELP-PLELP-PLELP...easy one - probably due to the fact that the start and ending mouth-shapes required are the same. I guess what would make something more tricky would be either very, or subtly different mouth-shapes at beginning and end of a given repeated word. |
|
| |
“Whelk” becomes quite hard work after about 5 or six repetitions, while “tot” is much simpler - despite both being single syllable words. |
|
| |
This would suggest that it’s more a matter of the physical manipulations required by the mouth than being a strictly a syllablactic metric (although the two are likely to correlate over a large enough sample) |
|
| |
<deep> It is in the repetition of the word where it
loses its meaning. </deep> |
|
| |
<joining in the deepness> Unless you're
meditating.....<ohmmmmm> |
|
| |
eys cied ses vi ce s':= a command corection regrest
polici devise of say, a PNAL BOMB, squd,, :_) |
|
| |
[s] can you wipe your ass somewhere else please ? thankyou. |
|
| |
I wonder, then, if you could train the neurons to somehow
be less susceptible to fatigue? |
|
| |
Maybe visualising the same object in different ways... |
|
| |
On another point, does anyone remember NESSAGUIN? |
|
| |
"that human vocabulary is very localised in the human brain in that it can be saturated or depleted." |
|
| |
zowie another possible thing to study at monozygotic twins to see if the genetics of minimal phrase depletion are genes of better than usual cognition or possibly singing ability |
|
| |
I chose a word at random from the idea. I started to
stutter after repeating "ultimately" only 23 times.
This is a very interesting phenomenon and I think it
should be studied. |
|
| |