h a l f b a k e r yLike gliding backwards through porridge.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Over-baked by Chinese chat bots already. |
|
|
Neither, because you haven't paid yet. |
|
|
Yes I have, I just gave you $20 USD ! |
|
|
//Sign him up.//He signed you up years ago. (but of course
you don't know, as the cheques are all diverted to me) |
|
|
I'm sorry, not to thow us off on a tangent, but you'll
need a cosin-er. |
|
|
I'd prefer to follow the better arc angles of our nature. |
|
|
Oh dear, trigonometry puns ... why do you feel the need to be so obtuse ? |
|
|
because I suffer from an acute desire for finding the shortest
path between two points |
|
|
Ah, would that be the Lost Chord ... ? |
|
|
I don't have any set theory on the subject, <8th of 7> |
|
|
I see the reactions are divided ... |
|
|
I can't even begin to polynomially express my feelings on this matter... |
|
|
It should be possible to Taylor a series to meet your criteria ... |
|
|
Can't you people act normal ? |
|
|
Being irrational doesn't necessarily let you get to the root
of the problem |
|
|
Yes, but how many actually are irrational ? Are those real numbers, or did you just make them up ? Have you any proof that they aren't imaginary ? |
|
|
Whatever fraction it is, your assertion is in poor taste; in fact, it's downright vulgar. |
|
|
Is there a risk that this idea could spawn a descendant called Internatroll Rescue ? |
|
|
As a traveling salesman, I find these attempts to Escher in a
new age lacking in symmetry. |
|
|
Any idea predicated on Escher's designs is bound to fall flat. |
|
| |