h a l f b a k e r yThis would work fine, except in terms of success.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Ever had the problem of an itch(no, don't read between the lines) that you can scratch, but not in polite company? or have you just shaved downstairs and are at it all the time? well you need Ro's all new, soon to be released motorized ball scratching under pants.
How does it work? - an abrasive band
driven by a small electric motor within the Y fronts encircles the offending appendages. The switch (bi-polar for forward and backward motion in case things become bound up) is located remotely -for example- a shirt cuff button. The batteries can be placed anywhere that is convenient - a pocket etc.
A retrofit version that could be used with your existing favourite pair will also be available.
[link]
|
|
I do like the idea, I just wish there were some way to do without the 'abrasive band.' Props for effort, tho' |
|
|
How about a hand shaped object that can be inserted in a similar fashion to a panty-liner. It could be pneumatic and with one pump of the hand-held squeezy, it would inflate and grasp the offending itchy area. A gentle squeeze would induce a more fondlesque experience. |
|
|
"Is that a hand in your pants or a you just itching to see me?" |
|
|
This idea is the dog's bollocks. |
|
|
[placid] - appropriately enough, you're half
right. |
|
|
but are the dog's bollocks itching? i could set you up with a pair for him as well. |
|
|
[MB] Which half then? The dog's, or
bollocks? |
|
|
I agree with [monk] - "abrasive band driven by a small electric motor" sounds uncomfortably like "belt sander" |
|
|
And god knows I don't want that to happen again. |
|
|
I agree with hippo. No belt sander in my pants, thanks. |
|
|
//Which half then? The dog's, or
bollocks?// Three guesses. |
|
| |