h a l f b a k e r y"My only concern is that it wouldn't work, which I see as a problem."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I do like the idea, I just wish there were some way to do without the 'abrasive band.' Props for effort, tho' |
|
|
How about a hand shaped object that can be inserted in a similar fashion to a panty-liner. It could be pneumatic and with one pump of the hand-held squeezy, it would inflate and grasp the offending itchy area. A gentle squeeze would induce a more fondlesque experience. |
|
|
"Is that a hand in your pants or a you just itching to see me?" |
|
|
This idea is the dog's bollocks. |
|
|
[placid] - appropriately enough, you're half
right. |
|
|
but are the dog's bollocks itching? i could set you up with a pair for him as well. |
|
|
[MB] Which half then? The dog's, or
bollocks? |
|
|
I agree with [monk] - "abrasive band driven by a small electric motor" sounds uncomfortably like "belt sander" |
|
|
And god knows I don't want that to happen again. |
|
|
I agree with hippo. No belt sander in my pants, thanks. |
|
|
//Which half then? The dog's, or
bollocks?// Three guesses. |
|
| |