Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
We don't have enough art & classy shit around here.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                                           

Double Idea Double Idea

Redundancy is sometimes necessary. Redundancy is sometimes necessary.
  (+3, -12)(+3, -12)
(+3, -12)
  [vote for,
against]

To prevent misunderstanding in communications, post everything twice to prevent information loss. This also extends to idea postings, of course.

To prevent misunderstanding in communications, post everything twice to prevent information loss. This also extends to idea postings, of course.

UnaBubba, Feb 09 2013

[link]






       [-] [-]
FlyingToaster, Feb 09 2013
  

       Hah! Hah!
UnaBubba, Feb 09 2013
  

       so, twice the idea, one half the content?
theircompetitor, Feb 09 2013
  

       Same idea, double the explanation. Probably baked by governments everywhere.   

       Same idea, double the explanation. Probably baked by governments everywhere.
UnaBubba, Feb 09 2013
  

       I I usually usually give give you you buns buns, Ubs Ubs. Not not this this time time.
swimswim, Feb 09 2013
  

       Someone did. Not me. I don't fishbone and I don't vote on my ideas.   

       Someone did. Not me. I don't fishbone and I don't vote on my ideas.
UnaBubba, Feb 09 2013
  

       If twice is better than once, then what about three times?
If twice is better than once, then what about three times?
If twice is better than once, then what about three times?
Vernon, Feb 09 2013
  

      
ytk, Feb 09 2013
  

       It may be true that redundancy is necessary, but sometimes, it is necessitated that there be a redundant element - in order that is, to ensure redundancy is in evidence, and that it is evidenced, redundantly.   

       It might also be worth pointing out that a level of repetition might be of use, to the extent that it's not actually used, except in the circumstance that the first be corrupted in some way, otherwise being surplus to requirement and acting only to reiterate previous points - though repetition of semantics need not mandate repetition of words and context (though there is danger of unwanted non-redundant meaning seeping through under these circumstances)
zen_tom, Feb 09 2013
  

       This is a no-no.
MaxwellBuchanan, Feb 09 2013
  

       I'm seeing double, I hope.
blissmiss, Feb 09 2013
  

       How can this be? Two cups of coffee is acceptable!
xandram, Feb 09 2013
  

       She has a points.
blissmiss, Feb 09 2013
  

       I'm with Vernon. This enables you to determine what was meant if you misunderstand it one time.   

       You should say it three times. This allows recovery from a misunderstanding or reading error in one of the three versions.   

       If you say it 3 times then the reader can perform error correction.
Loris, Feb 09 2013
  

       The Zip compression factor of this idea is excellent
theircompetitor, Feb 09 2013
  

       Help / feedback Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c' h a l f b a k e r y carpe demi   

       idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, pocmloc_date, All categories, random   

       meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem   

       account: pocmloc. edit, logout   

       ... Creating an enviromental friendly aquada Darwin's HalfBakery (-1) Defaults in fields (-1) delayed transmission via magnetic tape - art (+2) Double Idea Double Idea (+2, -10)(+2, -10) Dumbest Idea Ever (+3, -8)(+3, -8) Dumpster Diver (+2, -3) Forgotten ideas Half Bakery Evolution (+2, -7)(+2, -7) ...   

       halfbakery:idea Double Idea Double Idea Redundancy is sometimes necessary. Redundancy is sometimes necessary. (+2, -10)(+2, -10) (+2, -10) [change vote to neutral, for]   

       To prevent misunderstanding in communications, post everything twice to prevent information loss. This also extends to idea postings, of course.   

       To prevent misunderstanding in communications, post everything twice to prevent information loss. This also extends to idea postings, of course. — UnaBubba, Feb 08 2013   

       [link]   

         

         

       [-] [-] — FlyingToaster, Feb 08 2013   

       Hah! Hah! — UnaBubba, Feb 08 2013   

       so, twice the idea, one half the content? — theircompetitor, Feb 08 2013   

       Same idea, double the explanation. Probably baked by governments everywhere.   

       Same idea, double the explanation. Probably baked by governments everywhere. — UnaBubba, Feb 08 2013   

       But with two of everything you might get diboxyribenacake acid indigestion. — bigsleep, Feb 08 2013   

       I I usually usually give give you you buns buns, Ubs Ubs. Not not this this time time. — swimswim, Feb 08 2013   

       Someone did. Not me. I don't fishbone and I don't vote on my ideas.   

       Someone did. Not me. I don't fishbone and I don't vote on my ideas. — UnaBubba, Feb 08 2013   

       If twice is better than once, then what about three times? If twice is better than once, then what about three times? If twice is better than once, then what about three times? — Vernon, Feb 09 2013   

         

       — ytk, Feb 09 2013   

       It may be true that redundancy is necessary, but sometimes, it is necessitated that there be a redundant element - in order that is, to ensure redundancy is in evidence, and that it is evidenced, redundantly.   

       It might also be worth pointing out that a level of repetition might be of use, to the extent that it's not actually used, except in the circumstance that the first be corrupted in some way, otherwise being surplus to requirement and acting only to reiterate previous points - though repetition of semantics need not mandate repetition of words and context (though there is danger of unwanted non-redundant meaning seeping through under these circumstances) — zen_tom, Feb 09 2013   

       This is a no-no. — MaxwellBuchanan, Feb 09 2013   

       I'm seeing double, I hope. — blissmiss, Feb 09 2013   

       How can this be? Two cups of coffee is acceptable! — xandram, Feb 09 2013   

       She has a points. — blissmiss, Feb 09 2013   

       I'm with Vernon. This enables you to determine what was meant if you misunderstand it one time.   

       You should say it three times. This allows recovery from a misunderstanding or reading error in one of the three versions.   

       If you say it 3 times then the reader can perform error correction. — Loris, Feb 09 2013   

       The Zip compression factor of this idea is excellent — theircompetitor, Feb 09 2013   

       [annotate]   

         

         

       back: main index business computer culture fashion food halfbakery home other product public science sport vehicle
pocmloc, Feb 10 2013
  

       So fitting that this idea has two fishbones now.   

       So fitting that this idea has two fishbones now.
phundug, Feb 11 2013
  

       I'm off to get a cup of coffee.   

       I'm off to get a cup of coffee.
UnaBubba, Feb 11 2013
  

       This idea didn't get any better on the second reading.
AusCan531, Feb 12 2013
  

       Few of them do, [AusCan].
UnaBubba, Feb 15 2013
  

       It's been a week and nobody's posted "Double Idea Double Idea2". Your heinous fan paled.   

       [marked-for-deletion] not an idea.
FlyingToaster, Feb 16 2013
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle