h a l f b a k e r yMy hatstand runneth over
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
To prevent misunderstanding in communications, post
everything twice to prevent information loss. This also
extends to idea postings, of course.
To prevent misunderstanding in communications, post
everything twice to prevent information loss. This also
extends to idea postings, of course.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
so, twice the idea, one half the content? |
|
| |
Same idea, double the explanation. Probably baked
by governments everywhere. |
|
| |
Same idea, double the explanation. Probably baked
by governments everywhere. |
|
| |
I I usually usually give give you you buns buns, Ubs Ubs. Not not this
this time time. |
|
| |
Someone did. Not me. I don't fishbone and I don't
vote on my ideas. |
|
| |
Someone did. Not me. I don't fishbone and I don't
vote on my ideas. |
|
| |
If twice is better than once, then what about three times?
If twice is better than once, then what about three times?
If twice is better than once, then what about three times?
|
|
| |
It may be true that redundancy is necessary, but
sometimes, it is necessitated that there be a
redundant element - in order that is, to ensure
redundancy is in evidence, and that it is
evidenced, redundantly. |
|
| |
It might also be worth pointing out that a level of
repetition might be of use, to the extent that it's
not actually used, except in the circumstance
that the first be corrupted in some way, otherwise
being surplus to requirement and acting only to
reiterate previous points - though repetition of
semantics need not mandate repetition of words
and context (though there is danger of unwanted
non-redundant meaning seeping through under
these circumstances) |
|
| |
I'm seeing double, I hope. |
|
| |
How can this be? Two cups of coffee is acceptable! |
|
| |
I'm with Vernon. This enables you to determine what
was meant if you misunderstand it one time. |
|
| |
You should say it three times. This allows recovery
from a misunderstanding or reading error in one of
the three versions. |
|
| |
If you say it 3 times then the reader can perform
error correction. |
|
| |
The Zip compression factor of this idea is excellent |
|
| |
Help / feedback
Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
carpe demi |
|
| |
idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, pocmloc_date, All categories, random |
|
| |
meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem |
|
| |
account: pocmloc. edit, logout |
|
| |
...
Creating an enviromental friendly aquada
Darwin's HalfBakery (-1)
Defaults in fields (-1)
delayed transmission via magnetic tape - art (+2)
Double Idea Double Idea (+2, -10)(+2, -10)
Dumbest Idea Ever (+3, -8)(+3, -8)
Dumpster Diver (+2, -3)
Forgotten ideas
Half Bakery Evolution (+2, -7)(+2, -7)
... |
|
| |
halfbakery:idea
Double Idea Double Idea
Redundancy is sometimes necessary. Redundancy is sometimes necessary.
(+2, -10)(+2, -10)
(+2, -10) [change
vote to
neutral,
for] |
|
| |
To prevent misunderstanding in communications, post everything twice to prevent information loss. This also extends to idea postings, of course. |
|
| |
To prevent misunderstanding in communications, post everything twice to prevent information loss. This also extends to idea postings, of course.
— UnaBubba, Feb 08 2013 |
|
| |
[-] [-]
— FlyingToaster, Feb 08 2013 |
|
| |
Hah! Hah!
— UnaBubba, Feb 08 2013 |
|
| |
so, twice the idea, one half the content?
— theircompetitor, Feb 08 2013 |
|
| |
Same idea, double the explanation. Probably baked by governments everywhere. |
|
| |
Same idea, double the explanation. Probably baked by governments everywhere.
— UnaBubba, Feb 08 2013 |
|
| |
But with two of everything you might get diboxyribenacake acid indigestion.
— bigsleep, Feb 08 2013 |
|
| |
I I usually usually give give you you buns buns, Ubs Ubs. Not not this this time time.
— swimswim, Feb 08 2013 |
|
| |
Someone did. Not me. I don't fishbone and I don't vote on my ideas. |
|
| |
Someone did. Not me. I don't fishbone and I don't vote on my ideas.
— UnaBubba, Feb 08 2013 |
|
| |
If twice is better than once, then what about three times?
If twice is better than once, then what about three times?
If twice is better than once, then what about three times?
— Vernon, Feb 09 2013 |
|
| |
It may be true that redundancy is necessary, but sometimes, it is necessitated that there be a redundant element - in order that is, to ensure redundancy is in evidence, and that it is evidenced, redundantly. |
|
| |
It might also be worth pointing out that a level of repetition might be of use, to the extent that it's not actually used, except in the circumstance that the first be corrupted in some way, otherwise being surplus to requirement and acting only to reiterate previous points - though repetition of semantics need not mandate repetition of words and context (though there is danger of unwanted non-redundant meaning seeping through under these circumstances)
— zen_tom, Feb 09 2013 |
|
| |
This is a no-no.
— MaxwellBuchanan, Feb 09 2013 |
|
| |
I'm seeing double, I hope.
— blissmiss, Feb 09 2013 |
|
| |
How can this be? Two cups of coffee is acceptable!
— xandram, Feb 09 2013 |
|
| |
She has a points.
— blissmiss, Feb 09 2013 |
|
| |
I'm with Vernon. This enables you to determine what was meant if you misunderstand it one time. |
|
| |
You should say it three times. This allows recovery from a misunderstanding or reading error in one of the three versions. |
|
| |
If you say it 3 times then the reader can perform error correction.
— Loris, Feb 09 2013 |
|
| |
The Zip compression factor of this idea is excellent
— theircompetitor, Feb 09 2013 |
|
| |
back: main index
business computer culture fashion food halfbakery home other product public science sport vehicle |
|
| |
So fitting that this idea has two fishbones now. |
|
| |
So fitting that this idea has two fishbones now. |
|
| |
I'm off to get a cup of coffee. |
|
| |
I'm off to get a cup of coffee. |
|
| |
This idea didn't get any better on the second reading. |
|
| |
Few of them do, [AusCan]. |
|
| |
It's been a week and nobody's posted "Double Idea Double Idea2". Your heinous fan paled. |
|
| |
[marked-for-deletion] not an idea. |
|
| |