h a l f b a k e r yNot from concentrate.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
| |
Part of a whole range of packaging-themed sex toys? |
|
| |
Sounds like fumbling drunk sex. The first thrust will
be exciting, & every other thrust will be sadly
disappointing. |
|
| |
Have you taken your meds today, [FT] ? |
|
| |
Condom bubblewrap might be more practical. |
|
| |
Brings new perspective to the phrase "on the bubble". |
|
| |
So, technically, you could pop this condom many times and it would still work as a prophylactic? |
|
| |
Genius... and bubbled for her pleasure. |
|
| |
Excellent! And hopefully, you get to pop the bubbles sometime while in use! [+] |
|
| |
Hmmm, that's all I can say. I'm stumped. |
|
| |
[8/7] I take meds every day; "mine" is subjective. |
|
| |
[2fr] yep, a condom with bubbles on the outside: cooperative popping. |
|
| |
I may have missed the point, but wouldn't this
reduce friction? Maybe if the bubbles were
embedded and you put a lever/hinged piece of
harder rubber in each bubble so outside direction of
motion could be translated into increased friction? |
|
| |
It would significantly increase thickness, which is said by the experts to be a significant dimension. Perhaps you want the bubbles the other way round? Even a certain amount of burstage might subtend a still complementary angle? |
|
| |
If the bubbles were the other way around, not only would there be little sensation and the ejaculate would not remain in a reservoir, the thing wouldn't even stay on.
Yes even on yours, I don't care how big you think it is. |
|
| |
... Yes, you have a point there ... hmmm ... |
|
| |
um ... The user could strap it on, perhaps? |
|
| |