h a l f b a k e r yWhy did I think of that?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Perhaps rather then being able to accurately tell the time to the second what's required is a reminder that the seconds are passing. Introducing the ChronosT (TM).
The watch comes in a variety of styles and colours. The point of similarity between them all is that they have no hands or numbers,
merely a flat panel. Whether worn on the wrist, as a pendant, or a fob, the watch produces a slightly enhanced ticking as a reminder that life is passing and that many of us believe we're only gonna get one spin.
Variations to the ChronosT might include a watch with a ranging tick loudness, or one that gives a single loud "tick" at unplanned intervals.
[link]
|
| |
why not just take away the hour and minute hands and have a rotating bezel ?
you could always just count ? |
|
| |
Thanks for the comment neilp - I think I'd better send the first ChronosT to you. |
|
| |
probably just a personal thing [Non] - I'm more a sweeper than a ticker when it comes to watches. |
|
| |
Could I get a digital one? The ticking on analogue timepieces drives me crazy. |
|
| |
[yamahito] me too - I bought a new watch a couple of weeks back, and (because the shop was quite loud) I didn't notice the ticking noise.. It's fine to wear in public places, but I have to put it in my pocket at the cinema, and in a different room if I want to get to sleep. |
|
| |
A digital version might have an LCD display that shows a pulse of coloured ripples each second... or possibly in time with your heartbeat. |
|
| |
I like the thought of a sweeper and ticker version -- all you get is one second at a time. |
|
| |
I really like this post. It's very existential. Inspired! |
|
| |