h a l f b a k e r yGet half a life.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
we all know how hard it is to find the female g-spot. so, i was thinking- what with all this new digital technology and all- why not have a glove that has a special miniature camera in the index finger tip. this could connect to a tv screen (or even special glasses) so you could actually see where this
spot is!
okay, i know what you are thinking- its pretty dark in there. but thats simple- just put a miniature torch in the ring finger tip.
you could also have optional vibro fingers and lubricant secreting fingers. the possibilities are endless.
How to Pleasure Women
http://www.sexinfo101.com/
Just follow the links at the webpage till you get to the part you want. [NHstud1216, Aug 21 2001, last modified Oct 21 2004]
[link]
|
| |
The World According To Garp |
|
| |
I keep thinking of the gloves from BrassEye...| — | Pallex,
Aug 21 2001, last modified Aug 22 2001 |
|
|
| |
You won't know until you've tried. I say we let [cosmobrown] try. |
|
| |
One doesn't need visual feedback during this task. Instead, feedback from the female involved is what is required. |
|
| |
Very practical. With two of these, some might even be able to find their own hind ends. |
|
| |
I would get more use out of a Sax Glove. I've always wanted to play an instrument really well, and a Sax Glove would be just the ticket. |
|
| |
(Do we really need yet another sexual device thought up by a man and intended to pleasure a woman? Good Lord, women know what they want, let them tell us--I resolve to fishbone every idea for female sexual pleasure thought of by a man from this night forward. Unless it's really really good, that is.) (Oh, and 'digital' in this context is an execrable pun.) |
|
| |
What mrthing said. (And you are correct Dog Ed, we do not need another sexual device thought up by a man, for a woman). |
|
| |
::LATER::
It just occurred to me that the main reason I'm against this idea is that it is yet, another attempt at simplifying, and making the sexual experience more efficient. The problem, however, is that you can't localize good sex, and consequently, you can't get there by finding it sooner. |
|
| |
Good sex isn't about finding a physical location so much as it is about the TIME spent working up to and around the entire body both, physically and emotionally. |
|
| |
This sounds less like sex and more like a visit to the gynecologist. |
|
| |
I can't help envisioning this device as a big white cartoon glove with the attendant dopey-looking sausage fingers. And an accompanying instructional video narrated by Disney's Goofy. |
|
| |
What [nimchimpski] said. This would go down with the women about as well as stirrups. |
|
| |
It goes down as well? I missed that
part. |
|
| |
Perhaps more goes on at the gynecologist than I'd imagined. |
|
| |
The glove could store the route you took to get to the g-spot, and upload it automatically onto Mapquest.com. You could print out a "map" of your girlfriend's inner area to study in your spare time. |
|
| |
I think that one look at the monitor would kill the mood. |
|
| |
//some might even be able to find their own hind ends// |
|
| |
am i the only one on this website who only has one anus? |
|
| |
coupla mods and this could be a chastity belt... variations on Cinderella: wandering around the countryside looking for somebody to fit the glove... |
|
| |
Having seen a bit of scopy in my day I must confess that wanting to see the inside of the vagina in a sexual way is IMHO a fetish thing and not going to hit it big even with the sexually enlightened folks who are interested in manually finding the G spot. Further, if you can't feel it getting a visual isn't going to make it substantially more prominent. Also part of the problem you may be having stimulating your lady friend COULD BE A LACK OF COMMUNICATION. Why don't you simply ask directions? |
|
| |