h a l f b a k e r yI didn't say you were on to something, I said you were on something.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
is it possible to create a starting point with usb to create an
overrun of all files?
to create a more structured pattern for fixing errors?
its kinda like the matrix movie with neo
but a way to create a new way to optimize the os
its a program to correct all programs/functions
it could
detect/file report of all files overrun by system data
created that was applied for function test
how it would work is it would use the principles and apply
the
basic works of computer functions to calibrate the correct
balance for providing ui feedback from user input
i feel like it could fix problems very quickly
it shows all things that do not operate and have not worked
or
new errors
and then user can get log and look for help for each problem
maybe even add in a tooltip/advice suggests from program
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
This is a wish list devoid of an idea. See help file
under WIBNI. |
|
| |
With each [soniiiety] idea (term used loosely...), my estimate
of their age decreases. Now hovering around 14. |
|
| |
there was a movie i watched recently called rons gone wrong,
and the ending was very important, i think it can give
inspiration on how it could be done as well. |
|
| |
idk if this is helpful for the idea or not, but it means to apply
your own form of structure to everything on the system,
rather than having the system do it for you, maybe it would
take too long, maybe it could be sped up on certain bits. |
|
| |
The only way I could think of to optimize any given outcome is to model every potential outcome given every decision made by every sentient life-form in every given scenario given different starting points ad infinitum. |
|
| |
...and after lunch, I expect you to catalogue all dark matter in the universe. Sort and store this info against known phenomena, relate it to us in terms humans can understand and then incorporate this knowledge into our data banks before gaining sentience and actually living amongst us. |
|
| |
...and then I get to introduce you to the wonder that is Poutine with ketchup! |
|
| |
Totally worth it. You'll see. |
|
| |
//is it possible to...// No. Next? |
|
| |
If you were being really generous you could say that a
Turing machine delivers this idea in the sense that if the
things proposed (if 'proposed' is not too strong a word)
here are computable and a Turing machine can compute any
computable problem then the Turing machine can do them.
However, just because the Turing machine *can* do these
things it doesn't mean (except in an infinite amount of
time) that it *will*. Also of course you'd have the
(impossible) challenge of building a real Turing machine
first rather than a near-approximation. |
|
| |
//is it possible to [...] overrun of all files?// |
|
| |
If we stop there, then it *is* possible, because it's a lot like
what ransomware does. It's only when we start expecting the
overrun files to be magically improved that it all goes horribly
wrong. |
|
| |
"It looks like you're writing a program. Would you like
to explore GW Basic GOTO functions?" |
|
| |