h a l f b a k e r yLike you could do any better.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
I would really love a scanner into which you could put
multiple photos to scan, just as you would a feeder on a
xerox
machine. Somehow you would have to create a system so
that the photos would not get bent, but it has to be
possible.
Flatbed Scanners
http://techdepot.of...iid=194?AffID=11334
Dependent on the image size, you can do multiple images on most of these economy models, though none incorporates a true sheet feeder. [jurist, Jun 07 2002, last modified Oct 17 2004]
Loads of feeder scanners
http://bizrate.com/...51-,de_id--300.html
[pottedstu, Jun 07 2002, last modified Oct 17 2004]
Kodak photo scanner
http://www.kodak.co...apshotScanner.shtml
With auto feeder. [pottedstu, Jun 07 2002, last modified Oct 17 2004]
scanned
http://xroads.virgi.../kitchen/cattle.jpg
feeding [thumbwax, Jun 07 2002, last modified Oct 17 2004]
[link]
|
| |
Yes, so possible in fact that there are several of them in my office building. To put it another way, baked. |
|
| |
Amazing what you find when you type "photo scanner feeder" into Google! |
|
| |
But if you're scanning large number of photos you should use a film scanner (or possibly a transparency scanner) rather than scanning prints; many film scanners come with feeders for rolls of 35mm or APS film. |
|
| |
Or you could get a digital camera, perhaps? |
|
| |
No good if you have a backlog of old 35mm work to digitize (unless you plan to re-photograph the prints / negs / transparencies).
<aside> I've recently started using a digital camera (Sony Mavica) after years of 35mm stuff. I reasoned that I wasn't using my camera to its fullest extent (because it was a drag getting films developed) or to its fullest capabilities. The loss of features (manual focus, exposure control) in the Sony is not really a problem.</aside> |
|
| |