Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'

h a l f b a k e r y

"Bun is such a sad word, is it not?" -- Watt, "Waiting for Godot"

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:

pass:
register,

...
Sidecar outfit bus
Sleeper bus
sleeper bus
Stilt Bus
taxi-bus
Tidy Transit
Uber School Deluxe Edition
Viking school bus
Waggle Wagon

vehicle:bus

... bus stop
... entertainment
... fare
... route
... shape

taxi-bus

make taxis travel on bus routes

(+1)

[vote for,
against]

When full, a bus is a relatively efficient way of transporting people. However, full buses tend to only occur during peak hour. The rest of the time buses lumber around with a handful of passengers like ships-of-the-damned.

I reckon that it would be cheaper to send a few taxis along each route than one 10 tonne behemoth bus (with associated costs of fuel, unionised drivers and maintainance).

The taxis would be spaced 20 minutes apart rather than the 1 hour between buses. This would make it much more convenient for passengers.

—	xaviergisz, Oct 06 2009

Mass transit router Mass_20Transit_20Router
... taxi bus would be compatible with mass transit router [ixnaum, Oct 08 2009]

Please log in.
If you're not logged in, you can see what this page looks like, but you will not be able to add anything.

Short name, e.g., Bob's Coffee

Destination URL. E.g., https://www.coffee.com/

Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)

Buses (in London again) are also generally quite full. There's a non-obvious relationship between bus frequency and fullness - as the frequency increases the fullness of buses actually increases rather than decreases because more people decide to use them. This model only works up to a point, obviously. If buses came every few seconds, they wouldn't each have thousands of people on them.

—	hippo, Oct 06 2009

I live in a low density city that insists on providing public transport to every suburb. The population is 300,000 and the bus service (obviously heavily subsidised by the government) is used by <10% of population runs at a net loss of (I'm guessing)$50 million per annum. If ideology and unions were taken out of the equation, there are many better ways of transporting the public transport users. For example, every person who normally catches the bus could be given $1000 a year to catch taxis (the taxi service would also need to be deregulated for this to work).

—	xaviergisz, Oct 06 2009

There might be a business-model in there: The taxi drivers get paid a low(by taxi standards) fare by the occupants, but get subsidized by passengers-transported from the bus company that in turn can save on busses.

—	loonquawl, Oct 06 2009

"This model only works up to a point, obviously. If buses came every few seconds, they wouldn't each have thousands of people on them."
I think that deserves to be tested.

—	phoenix, Oct 08 2009

Agreed - I used to like the bus until I realised that I was, at home-time, normally waiting for 2 or 3 full buses to go past before a more reasonably populated one came along - which might take between 20 minutes and an hour.

—	zen_tom, Oct 08 2009

back: main index

business computer culture fashion food halfbakery home other product public science sport vehicle