h a l f b a k e r yGo ahead. Stick a fork in it.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
A solution to a current problem.
[link]
|
| |
I thought it was just ice on the funnel? But if it's a gas
hydrate, would a superhydrophobic coating work? |
|
| |
Also, why can't they just dump tons of rock and concrete on
the hole? |
|
| |
Super low temperature, high pressure environment,
leads to inconclusive maths. |
|
| |
Why not simply charge people admission to zip around the oil slick in jet boats that are fuelled by the slick itself? |
|
| |
//Super low temperature, high pressure environment, leads
to inconclusive maths.// |
|
| |
You ought to see a doctor about that. |
|
| |
But, if the funnel were that hydrophobic, they'd never get it into the water, much less sink it. |
|
| |
Gas hydrates are just a form of ice, and their
formation leads to clogs in the funnel in much the
same way that pipes get clogged in the winter. I
heard of this type of solution for the 'at-home'
version a few years ago so I halfbaked away, as per
usual.. |
|
| |
//Gas hydrates are just a form of ice// Yes....ish. They
contain hydrocarbons, though, which means they're not
watery-ice completely. You may well find that a
hydrophobic coating will promote, rather than inhibit, their
accumulation. |
|
| |
<bad faux-cockney singing voice>
Um tiddle iddle iddle
Um tiddl-eye
Um tiddle iddle iddle
Um tiddl-eye
Superhydrophobic coatings expedite stenosis...
<\bf-csv> |
|
| |
Damn. So you did. But mine scans better... |
|
| |
MB, the surface of the hydrate complex is all water
molecules, so the hydrophobicity should apply. But
yes, sometimes you can never tell about these
things. |
|
| |
Aha! In that case (a) you are probably right and (b) I have
learned a new thing. |
|
| |
I dun get it: the problem is ice ? (or methane calthrate or whatever) so what ? put a frickin' electric de-icer on the sides... or blow some air down there and burn enough of the oil to have it de-ice itself. |
|
| |
5,000 barrels a day is about 3 gallons per second... doesn't sound like *that* big a flow to be a problem for engineers. |
|
| |
[edit: hmmmmm... totally different idea posted] |
|
| |