h a l f b a k e r yThe best idea since raw toast.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
These are baked, but not widely and not in the form you
describe. [8th] and I were arguing
about it a few weeks ago <linky>. There is a super-secret
British
see-through walls motion detector that is currently being
tested in Afghanistan by the SAS and their chums.
Supposedly, it can tell the difference between animals and
people. I have only a general description of it, based on an
article in Jane's and some educated guesswork, but
perhaps the Borg will drop by and enlighten us further. |
|
|
Meanwhile, I have a driveway motion sensor that can tell
the difference between a car and a moose. |
|
|
Smart motion sensors for burglar alarms already exist. Do a search for "Pet Immune" motion detectors. They can require significant tweaking to be tuned in. |
|
|
However, anything that will pass a large dog will pass a small, crawling human, so I think there is a limit on the possible functionality here. |
|
|
#MechE: I did already know that standard motion detectors can be tweaked to reject objects below a threshhold size (especially the ones using cameras rather than ultrasonic sonar) but the difference here is that the Kinect actually detects the human body shape, and ought to (no promises, mind you) be able to distinguish between a crawling human and a similar sized dog. |
|
|
I would imagine though that dressing up in a pantomime horse costume would throw it for a loop :-) (probably best to rely on the large size in that instance) |
|
|
"The government has today announced that wearing a pantomime horse costume will be treated as 'attempt to burgle' and owning of said disguise as 'possession of burglaring implements' unless current membership in a theater production company can be proven." |
|
| |