h a l f b a k e r yNot the Happy Cuddle Club.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
We all know that speech recognition is still a little flakey and probably will be for some time. Why not use the internet to get your documents typed by a virtual typing pool, made up of enterprising individuals who subscribe and accept your typing job under a dutch auction system. They receive your
audio file, transcribe it into MS Word, and send it back. Payment, quality control, feedback and disputes are handled via the central admin system (a kind of ebay or elance). The idea must be a winner, when you consider the benefits of anonymity, low international costs, and the sheer scalability of the idea. Perfect for dictating your memoirs, your next novel, political diatribe or coaching manual.
ELance
http://www.elance.com/
fiedag's link, linked [yamahito, Oct 04 2004]
Winscribe - Network Dictation Systems
http://www.winscribe.com/
[calum, Oct 04 2004]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
Such a service exists (or at least it did last time I was looking for a steno). |
|
| |
[fiedag]...and the nobel prize for literature goes to mr.xxx living in a small village in the country yyy. |
|
| |
Accept exact change in dollars. |
|
| |
Dictanet still appears to be a type of speech recognition software. True? It wouldn't be able to cope with multiple people having a conversation, whereas a skilled typist could certainly do that. Accuracy and quality can be measured by clients providing a rating for the work done. Have a look at www.elance.com |
|
| |
This is baked on an internal network level at my office, where electronic dictation is passed over a network to a chosen subset of secretaries. Revision is still done on hard copies but there's plenty of software that allows for changes in documents to be tracked. As a sort of private client service, I like this. |
|
| |
"Dictanet still appears to be a type of speech recognition software. True?"
I was proposing an alternate name. I didn't realize Dictanet was an actual product/service. |
|
| |
I know this doesn't really contribute, but send an MP3 or something, not a WAV or the bandwidth costs would make it cheaper to pay a secretary... |
|
| |
What about privacy issues? Physicians leave orders/reports for a transcriptionist over phone, who types the transcript and emails it to the physicians and hospital records department. One of the hospitals tried outsourcing this to a 3rd world company but could not get past the laws/policies regarding medical record privacy issues. |
|
| |
You could do without the administrative
element if the typists could be ranked
by the customers indicating degree of
satisfaction in an online survey and the
lower ranked ones could be cheaper
with rankings stored on the coop
website. |
|
| |
But is s/he part of a //virtual typing pool, made up of enterprising individuals who subscribe and accept your typing job under a dutch auction system. // ? |
|
| |
If not it's not fully baked. |
|
| |
(Also baked isn't necessarily reason for m-f-d. Needs to be widely known to exist.) |
|
| |
[calum], I agree an internal network system is likely to work better especially given the regulatory concerns raised up by [Porsche911]. The technology could and should be the same in either case. [david_scothern] thanks, MP3 it is!
[shonagon_53] i'm sure you're right, but have you got any examples? |
|
| |