h a l f b a k e r yThis would work fine, except in terms of success.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Correct gravity is a conservative field. |
|
|
[madness], darling, do you realize how little sense you make? Wot the blazes is "correct gravity"? Or did you mean "Correct: gravity is a conservative field?" And what does that mean, anyway? Are you alluding to the principle of conservation of energy? Or conservation of momentum? Or what? |
|
|
A lawyer once told me punctuation should be ignored --- so I stopped using it. Lawyers are always right... |
|
|
Wow ummm. I pick.... Energy! Anyway Correct gravity is conservative. |
|
|
Well, yes it would work [+], particularly at road tolls. It's a little bit baked, as you observe yourelf. |
|
|
It's also been applied to rail systems - London Underground's Jubilee Line has gradients up to and down from each platform for exactly this reason. |
|
|
It's probably more applicable to the rail environment, because speed and braking rates are more predictable and consistent, and you don't (usually) get queues of trains waiting at the bottom of the gradient. |
|
|
So, um, isn't this a "me too" or a "let's all" ? |
|
|
Actually Doc this sounds more like a "isnt it cool that thing I saw" but certianly not an idea. |
|
| |