h a l f b a k e r yCaution! Contents may be not!
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
hell, maybe advertize that page to investors or companies etc. |
|
|
If any of my ideas needs more time in the oven, I just anno on it ... move it to the top for a bit ... |
|
|
It's called churning, [Fort], and is discouraged. Anyway, it doesn't mean your ideas are the most practical. |
|
|
We've had an idea before for voting in categories, which would allow you to vote on practicality as well as general quality. See [amadeus]'s 2D voting idea, where votes are made on the axes of good/bad and baked/unbakable, and the annotations. |
|
|
Why do the practical ones get special consideration? It's not like we're actually ever going to create any of these. |
|
|
If you've got one worthy of creating, don't post it here. Go do it and make your millions. |
|
|
If I wanted practical, I'd put some clothes back on. |
|
|
Most of the time I wouldn't have a clue whether an idea was practical or not and neither would I have any idea about the capability of any of the other 'bakers to make such a judgement. So this would be a complete waste of time. |
|
|
Ahem: Massive Solar Collector Array (of Evil?) |
|
|
Evilly practical. Practically evil. |
|
|
The really GOOD ideas are the closest ones to being real. So I would think that the "Best/Top Ten" would basically be repeated in the "Most Practical" list. |
|
|
I was tempted to mention the Blackholeapult, but it's practicallity is still under debate. |
|
| |