h a l f b a k e r yOn the one hand, true. On the other hand, bollocks.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Suck in air above the topmost page, lifting it up. (You don't need - or want - a perfect vacuum attachment; just a short blast is enough.) |
|
|
Then a short gust from the side should be able to get below that page and turn it. |
|
|
//mini vacuums that hold the pages down // |
|
|
This implies a vacuum sealed by a standard paper page, which doesn't ring true to me; do you, perhaps, mean many mini-tubes through which air is being fanned or pumped away from the page, so as to create a suction effect? |
|
|
//a short burst of air, therefore turning the page// |
|
|
How are you directing this burst so that it catches the top page but not the next page? |
|
|
//mini vacuums that hold the pages down // |
|
|
Sounds awfully complicated. In any case, kinda what Jutta said. A slight vacuum to lift the turning page. But then the weight of the vacuum arms themselves could hold the pages down. |
|
|
[I do have this vague childhood memory of trying to turn the pages of a book with my mouth, sucking in to lift them, then blowing to move them over. I do not recall how successful it was, but maybe you should try that experiment to test the viability of this idea.] |
|
|
I built a prototype back in the eighties, but ran into problems with the suction deforming the page and picking up more than one page at a time with the deformation, however small. |
|
| |