h a l f b a k e r yMagical moments of mediocrity.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
There are already UFOs* on Google Maps. See link. |
|
|
*Insofar as they remain unidentified, and are presumably flying. |
|
|
/track around a UFO and take pics of it(maybe while its "Crop Circling"?)/ |
|
|
I think youll find that alien looks exactly like Farmer Giles and his 90 illegitimate offspring. Get off my bastrd land. |
|
|
Catch aliens in the act...that is unpredictable, and would require many, many sattelittes, and they would have to constantly monitor Earth, waiting for the unexpected. |
|
|
Pa've has the origins of crop circles right, probably. There is a natural phenomenon that certainly could inspire artists and jokers. I thought a film team did get invited out with a couple of circle-makers. |
|
|
Those Google photos could be showing a pin used to hold the paper or film in place for reproduction or enlargement. |
|
|
The dots could also be copyright protection marks of some sort, made with a pin or bead or something. Any image showing those dots has to have been copied from Google. The dots seem to be located next to the name Google pretty often. (Perhaps the dots are the pins used to hold the word Google on the film for copying.) |
|
|
Damn you,[waugs], for pointing out those things. 2 hours shot, reading those postings. And its not the first time a link you provided has drained hours from my life. |
|
|
[admin: renmaed from 'UFO Sattelitte' to
'UFO Satellite'] |
|
|
Pip: it's not generally de rigeur or
comme il faut to delete annos unless
they are offensive or spectacularly off
topic (and even then.....) |
|
|
Little green men from Mars don't make crop circles - it's usually large, ruddy ones from the Dog and Duck. |
|
|
talking about the tooth fairy in this topic about UFOs are not off-topic base? |
|
|
never mind base, feel free to post anything you would like about the tooth fairy, i will not impose on your freedom of speech |
|
|
//Talking about the tooth fairy in this
topic about UFOs are not off-topic
base?// No matter. I was simply
making the skeptical point that I
consider it just as fruitful to use
satellite images to look for the tooth-
fairy as for UFOs. The same
technology could, perhaps, spot Father
Christmas making his
deliveries. Incidentally, we are
perhaps assuming here that UFOs will
be quite large (larger than, say, the
tooth-fairy), but there is no evidence to
substantiate this. Given the much-
heralded advances in nanotechnology
and the supposed superiority of alien
intelligences, perhaps it would make
more sense to look for teeny weeny
UFOs (a-la-Douglas Adams) ? |
|
|
So maybe that's what we are seeing in the Google images--nano-UFOs hovering over the air-photo prints as they are being digitally imaged. They just look like the heads of straight pins--they are little UFOs copying our air photos! Frickin' aliens. |
|
|
this is not about google maps, i was just using them as my base of idea, im talking about using a sattelite to find ufos, when people report them, we can just move the sattelite to see it and take pictures of it, i was talking about making our own thing, because there are probably some things that google does to the images... |
|
|
Hmmm. Pipucho, I am going to bun
this idea, not because it will find any
UFOs (except insofar as they are flying
objects that somebody has problems
identifying), but because it could
potentially be used to debunk them.
"Yeah, we got your UFO right here. For
a 250-metre disc-shaped silver craft
with unheard of acceleration, it looks a
lot like KLM1011." [+] |
|
| |