h a l f b a k e r yNot just a think tank. An entire army of think.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Apropos limited and dwindling cemeterial real estate-- stacking caskets say, 10 deep in a single grave saves space and deters would-be graverobbers, at least from coffins level [-2] - [-10].
All funerals held on a particular day at a particular graveyard could share a single tomb. The individual
sarcophagi need only be separated by a few inches to a foot or so of earth apiece; John Doe might be 6 feet under, while Mary Smith is 60. May they jointly rest in multi-level peace!
"Here lies Susan, Frank, Tom, Linda..."
(?) Multi-level directory plaque
http://i4.tinypic.com/10moqpk.jpg
[nihilo, May 24 2006]
[link]
|
| |
how would you propose that each interred (sp?) be recoginized? individual head stones seem an unlikely choice given the clutter that would result. |
|
| |
I've already thought of it. Just like this: [link]. |
|
| |
Who would have thought Bentley have such a scruffy directory board in their building. |
|
| |
Did you specify under-ground just to avoid the 'baked' calls? |
|
| |
No -- it was so I could put a golf course on the land, and those towering catacombs really break up the green. |
|
| |
Golf course? Why didn't you just start your idea with that?. [+] |
|
| |
Something to do with the snowball effect... |
|
| |