h a l f b a k e r yIf you need to ask, you can't afford it.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
is this for karaoke purposes? oh, I think I missed something here. |
|
| |
No, I was thinking more for checking your track wasn't an accidental cover of something else... Or it might be used in court copyright cases. |
|
| |
([po], Check your multiply account) |
|
| |
what a cacophony! :( now you know I have no ear for this stuff. |
|
| |
Listen to it on headphones and one channel at a time (pop-in/out your headphones, if you can't cope with the binauralness of it ;) ) |
|
| |
BTW, it sounds perfectly normal to me. Actually, I quite like it. |
|
| |
it repeats - I went off to read something and yes, its growing on me - no headphones though. |
|
| |
more an automated search than a compare, yes ? |
|
| |
Yes, but that's what text differs do |
|
| |
I mean automated searching through a large database of songs, rather than one at a time (for which you can use your ears). |
|
| |
No, not a database. You provide two songs and it analyses them and plays correllated parts alongside eachother. I suppose you could run the comparison against all the music on iTunes/Amazon etc... but that may take some time. |
|
| |
//An example is not provided (unless you ask very nicely)//
Please, pretty please? With marmalade on top? |
|
| |
Kind of related - It's trivial to find the difference between a track and its mp3 or other lossily encoded product; it's just a straightforward subtraction of each corresponding sample value, taking into account any padding at the track's end(s). The result is essentially pure compression artifact, and is rather interesting to hear. |
|
| |
What you are trying to do sounds highly non trivial. |
|
| |
There’s actually a feature of a lot of audio editors
called “remove vocals” that uses the difference
between the left and right channels to remove
whatever is exactly in the middle (usually the
vocals). |
|
| |
[mouseposture] are you on multiply.com? {social network} |
|
| |
Get a (free) account and send a PM personal message to user [dubatmultiply] {let me know your HB handle, too} and I'll let you have a listen. |
|
| |
[spidermother], non-trivial, but non-impossible... Shazam manages to do something a little similar... and arguably, part of the task. |
|
| |
[ojsx], yes, but usually just clever mixing (subtracting the common signal - which works becauce the vocal is usually on both L/R channels). Not really the same thing, but might be part of the task, too. |
|
| |
[bigsleep], well talking Italian isn't going to help, is it?!
It could just pitch-hift/tempo-shift one track relative to the other... Non-trivial, but... somewhere I have a great link to show you... Meanwhile, skedaddle over to Multiply, let me know your Id, and listen (and retract that bone, sir!) |
|
| |
[Dub] Sure, I didn’t mean to suggest it was the same
thing; just thought it would be of interest if you
didn’t know about it. |
|
| |
I feel the need to stick the phrase "aural turpitude" somewhere. |
|
| |
Did it stay in, or has it fallen out? |
|
| |