h a l f b a k e r yIt might be better to just get another gerbil.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
When you hang a picture using the standard “wire-attached-to-the-frame” mount, it tends to lean forward
so there's a
gap
between the top edge and the wall. If the wire were
attached to the frame via spring-loaded recoilers, it would
pull the wire taut after
hanging, making the picture flush
with the wall.
Keyed Wall Bracket
http://www.organize...nger-for-canvas.asp
This type of wall bracket also works well at keeping your picture tightly affixed to the wall but is slightly more difficult to install and/or remove than the single nail hanger and wire system. Also takes care of any self-leveling problems when properly installed. [jurist, Sep 29 2013]
[link]
|
| |
That is not such a bad idea. The recoilers (and
string) could be recessed relative to the back of the
picture. |
|
| |
(+) Some people will certainly like this. Me, my pictures hang forward avoiding most dust. Self leveling would be a plus, though. |
|
| |
Wouldn't the spring-loaded recoilers also pull the wire taut
BEFORE hanging? |
|
| |
Presumably, you'd pull out the wire with one hand like a bowstring to get it onto the hook. |
|
| |
Attaching the wire near the front of the frame also helps. In fact, even with a retractable wire, you'll need to attach it somewhat forward. Even tensioned wires sag somewhat. |
|
| |
What's wrong with screwing the picture to the wall like they do in pubs? |
|
| |
Many of us who regularly paint get around the self-flushing issue by using a frame which is more deeply rabbeted on its back side. The deep sides allow it to hang properly on the wall without tilting using standard wire. |
|
| |
I don't want to know what sort of sick things you do
with those poor little bunnies. |
|
| |