h a l f b a k e r yFutility is persistent.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
As soon as you have a mind, you are detached from
reality. |
|
| |
//If the subject interprets the responses like Rorschach they are determined to be a pseudoscientist// So what does this response make you? |
|
| |
We accept your paper/idea for publication. |
|
| |
//We accept your paper/idea for publication.// |
|
| |
Sp.: "We accept your paper/idea for publication, at a
page charge of..." |
|
| |
I worry that I'm a hypochondriac. |
|
| |
There's a new placebo out for that. |
|
| |
Everything from Lombroso's criminological positivism, to
19th century racism can recursively become evaluations
for psychological abberation now that the social harm of
those delusions have been proven. |
|
| |
A moth who dipped its wings in ink and flew around
the paper, under a cloud, with skeletons and ice
cream cones. |
|
| |
This is a dialectical process as the analogy of psychiatry
as
schizophrenia and the actual materiality fact of
psychiatry
being schizophrenia and causing implosionary breakdown
in a system when an entire subjectivity and the
statistical
objectivity of the Rorschach Test as an empiricists tool
was eliminated. |
|
| |
In fact roschach may have in fact been a dialectical
materialist, using his theoretical object to create
normative correspondance to certain analogous objects
inside a hallucination. Hallucination and analogy and the
reification of normative hallucinatory interpretations
through statistical profiling. Much like the milgram line
experiment normative interpretation can influence
hallucination, shared delusion. Given that normativity
can produce group hallucination and the rorshach test
was the dialectical object of a material ironic breakdown
proves dialectical materialism. The Roscharch test is
ultimately an ironic object, that produced a reducio
absurdum argument about itself, as people became
integrated into the normative machinery. |
|
| |
Comparative literature of psychology much? [+]
While it is easy to echo cries of "Hark! Herein is
madness!" through the glass house, there is joy in
finding the angle where the house fully reflects
itself and is transcended on its own level. |
|
| |
This structural framework calls for a reification and
therein a transcendence of the dialectic: a
dialogue with
one's meta-sane (i.e. insane) self purporting to
ironically and recursively question the conscious-
unconscious relationship as an analogy for the
psychiatrist-patient relationship. |
|
| |
To propose further reduction of psychology (i.e. all
relationships, i.e. pseudoscience) I define a vector
on an eight-dimensional cylinder where four
coordinates represent the individual's Meyers-
Briggs Personality Type, and the remaining four
coordinates represent the magnitude (i.e.
strength, i.e. detachment) of the corresponding
coordinates from the individual's conception of
those facets of their personality. The Biot-Savart
Law in application to a four-dimensional surface
within this space yields a measure of the subject's
sanity, which is holistically computed to protest
the cruel ironic hegemony of the object's
subjectivication (e.g. sublimation of objectivity)
and therein hierarchical enslavement to Baconian
norms. In reality, the normative machinery is a
cruel parody of itself, as reality prohibits group
hallucination but is itself a group hallucination
subject to the dialectic. |
|
| |
OK I see meyer-briggs personalities as normative
categories, each connected to functional social roles,
the detachment of the subject from these useful norms
and their own self-concept creates a sanity function in
your model. Most sane would be the normalisations
reify behaviourally with matching self concept, most
insane would be loss of selfconcept and breakdown of
stable personality patterns. In between would be loss of
selfconcept and reification of new personality, and
gaining selfconcept and breakdown of personality. The
group hallucination is ironically everyone is sane and
normal in their personality categories, but really they
are just actively resisting the breakdown of the reality of
analogical normativity or 'likeness' the normative
machine generates by inducing a negative polarity of
madness that repells individuals from lone hallucination
to the safety of group hallucination. |
|
| |
I like it when we talk about custard. What happened to custard? I like custard. |
|
| |
Custard became such a common idea it wasn't an original
idea anymore. That not much remains of the earlier
halfbakery community culture is probably because of that
same process. It all became too baked, too real, to be
halfbaked. It's ironic that when the halfbakery develops a
stable culture that's actually the idea breaking down. |
|
| |
" OK I see meyer-briggs personalities as normative categories " |
|
| |
Aaand identified the author in eight words just scanning the idea in a hurried manner. |
|
| |
[xandram] Rorschach sentences are the bread and
butter of the bakery. Even without assigning a
meaning, I feel the end of the sentence doesn't flow.
Maybe the last and should be an of. |
|
| |
Psychology has largely replaced comportment as the
major domain for social control. At one time people
would have been taught the exact manner in which they
would conduct themselves. Their social behaviour
would be a regime of manners and breakdown would be
indicated by uncouth behaviour. This system is still
evident to some extent. But psychology has replaced it.
In the contemporary period regulation and breakdown is
psychological rather than the breakdown Durkhiem
would have been talking about when people's
behavioural norms were more rigifly defined when
customs, manners and politness and things like that
were strongly enforced as the social fabric. That has
given way to a culture of mass amateur psychologists
that arn't watching for your grammar school manners but
psychological deviance. This too will likely give way, as
did the aforementioned positivist regimes. |
|
| |
Think about Leave it to Beaver the television show. It
shows a 1950s family in America. Since then the social
control structure of American society has changed. The
show portrays a cast of archetypal characters. Television
had a role in influencing people to become archetypal
characters as it became an element in social control, or
mass social effect. This was a key point in the
psychologisation of society as behaviour became
influenced by these normative formations rather than by
school marms in an inflexible society towards any
behavioural deviance. |
|
| |
The Rorschach test combines disciplinary society with
psychological normalisation into archetypes. The
Roscharch Test imploded psychological society just as
television imploded the disciplinary society of the 1950s.
The equivocation of social deviance with psychological
deviance has broken down. Consider and contrast an
"ILL MANNERED" person, and a "MENTALLLY ILL" person
today. Both are a normalized hallucinatory perception of
abnormailty. The behavioral and cognitve analogy and its
reification consitutes a single reality, and anything
unanalogous to the norm or analogous to other
archetypes ie schizophrenia is subject to dominant
hallucination persecution. Rorschach Test is a dialectical
material object like the television because it imploded
social control society. Capital according to Marx is
dialectical material, and his theory of capital dialectical
materialism suggests from an existential
phenomenological perspective that it imprisons the
worker in a meaninglessness of existence that the
worker will seek freedom and meaning from in a
revolutionary way. Or is that the beautiful Ayn Rand. I
will think more about ut. |
|
| |
The textualization of reality is subject to error
due to the ineffability of the human experience;
additionally the notion of truth is suspect when
discussing conflicting metaphysical frameworks
which explain (i.e. textualize) reality in
complementary ways. In other words, ironic
implosion or similar textual deconstruction
typically does not lead to correspondingly
significant physical events, though it may imply
them. In fact, there appear to be competing
realities and frameworks for explaining the world
(e.g. norms). The test proposed in the original
idea, by labeling as pseudoscience all non-dadaist
(i.e. non-literal) interpretations of inkblots, would
indicate that pseudoscience is a necessary
prerequisite for self-awareness. |
|
| |
//Television had a role in influencing people to become archetypal characters as it became an element in social control, or mass social effect.// |
|
| |
And it sold a heckuva lot of washing powder. |
|
| |
//Psychology has largely replaced comportment as
the major domain for social control.// |
|
| |
Can we have justice next? Pretty please? |
|
| |
[wjt] Your *of* is accepted by my elf. |
|
| |
You've never met anyone who actually worked in
advertising, have you, [rcarty]? |
|
| |