h a l f b a k e r yWhere life irritates science.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
When dunking circular biscuits (and please note that I am using
the word "biscuit" in the English way, as a brittle baked item
which is usually, though not necessarily, sweet), it often
happens that the diameter of the biscuit is greater than that
of the mug.
Advanced amateur dunkers, as well
as professionals, tend to
get around this problem by first breaking the biscuit in half.
The ideal - as judged by the Greater London and Regional
Biscuit Dunking Advisory Panel - is for the biscuit to break
diametrically into two identical halves. Each half can then be
dunked to the officially mandated 35% level.
However, snapping brittle items such as biscuits is never
straightforward. Homogeneous, fine-grained biscuits such as
digestives will generally (though not always) fracture
satisfactorily. But coarse-grained biscuits such as the HobNob
may have their fracture line diverted - or even branched - by
local structural elements at the meso-scale. The result can be
an unevenly fractured biscuit, where one part is still too large
to dunk, and the other is too small for convenient dunkage.
Worse yet, the biscuit may undergo catastrophic failure by
breaking into three or more pieces, one of which will
inevitably end up either in the beverage (a so-called "floating
dunk", which leads to all sorts of problems) or on the floor.
A simple remedy to this serious problem exists. Biscuits which
are both circular and large should be baked with a set of
perforations across their diameter. To a limited extent, these
will act as stress concentrators; but the inhomogeneity of the
biscuit means that stress concentration cannot be depended
on for reliable crack propagation. It will therefore be
necessary to ensure that the perforations are sufficiently
close-spaced, relative to their dimensions, to cause
appreciable local weakening of the biscuit material. For
safety, MaxCo. engineers recommend a perforation spacing of
no more than 1.5x the hole diameter.
Biscuit_20hammer
[hippo, Mar 18 2019]
Literally baked
https://www.gettyim...otography/122012128 [pocmloc, Mar 18 2019]
Alternative solution
https://isohedral.ca/little-dipper/ Possibly what 2fries was thinking of, but unfortunately no longer for sale. [Loris, Mar 18 2019]
Tangram_20Chocolate_20Bar
[xenzag, Mar 22 2019]
[link]
|
|
Yes, that's a popular strategy too. However, it can often
result in an inadequate first dunk, making it almost impossible
to get an adequate bite of biscuit that includes the right
proportion of dunked and undunked biscuit. It can also lead
to a preference for over-filled mugs. |
|
|
I once saw a mug with an elongated indent on either side to fit any size of cookie or biscuit which made me chuckle but I can't find an image of it now so you'll have to take my word for it. |
|
|
As long as the biscuit fits, the mug is neither half empty nor half full... |
|
|
I don't know why this isn't done. Some prior art (stone-
ground wheat crackers) is right there for the world to see. I
would also like this done for other crackers, so as to make
dipping (not to be confused with dunking) easier and more
productive. |
|
|
Be sure to test the structural integrity of your biscuit before breaking it (see link).
Also - //it often happens that the diameter of the biscuit is greater than that of the mug// - I think you've identified your problem there. If you were adhering to commonly agreed ISO biscuit and mug standards this wouldn't happen. |
|
|
//ISO biscuit and mug standards// Ah yes, but we live in an
imperfect world. Standard chocolate digestives, for
instance, seldom adhere to ISO standards (unless you leave
them chocolate-side down in a warm place). |
|
|
In the unlikely event that biscuit manufacturers do not
immediately adopt this remedy, MaxCo.'s Consumer Product
Development Team (Biscuit and Crossbow Division) is working
on an appliance with a bank of 1.2mm drills that can create
the necessary perforations in all but the hardest of biscuits. |
|
|
I invented a new mug for you to solve this
problem. |
|
|
Pah. Solutions are ten-a-penny. Defining the problem, that's
the challenge. |
|
|
Close [Loris] The one I've seen was a normal looking mug but with those same protrusions. Might have been home-made who knows. Close though. |
|
|
// Defining the problem, that's the challenge. // |
|
|
Try looking in a mirror ... |
|
|
<adds [8th] to Sturton's "special" Christmas list> |
|
|
//This often (though not always, nor even sometimes) reduces the girth to a manageable and fittable value.// |
|
|
Surely shortbread is proportionally wider than longbread and therefore will fit into proportionally fewer receptacles? |
|
|
Not a lot of people realise this, but longbread and shortbread are actually exactly the same thing, just rotated by 90° - amazing, eh? |
|
|
[hippo] tetris! did you know the blocks had names? so memorable, I forget them. |
|
|
"Have you forgotten yet ?" |
|
|
//tetris! did you know the blocks had names? so
memorable, I forget them.// |
|
|
x
xx The "damn it how many of those in a row?"
_x |
|
|
_x
_x
xx The jammy dodger |
|
|
I had forgotten about my Tangram Bar. (link) |
|
| |