h a l f b a k e r yOn the one hand, true. On the other hand, bollocks.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
How many time have you been torn between the desire to allow strangers a glimpse of your unfinished basement, and the knowledge that riding commando is unhygienic and maybe sinful? For those of you straddling the horns of this dilemma, we at BUNGCO shed a tear. We can help!
Introducing None-derwear!
These quality fleshtone silk undergarments have a lifelike print of barenaked gentle regions at the appropriate parts. The rendition is lifelike enough to distract police interrogating you and cause a stir below when you dance on the catwalk - yet your true private parts remain so.
Like this?
http://www.ebaumswo...om/japanskirts.html
[angel, Aug 26 2005]
Maybe a bit more like this...
http://uk.news.yaho...0822/364/fq6bx.html
Sorry, no pics. You'll have to conjure up the images yourself. [junglefish, Aug 29 2005]
Uh oh, baked?
http://www.athosdeo.../en/index.php?kat=5
Intergalactic? Whatever that means... [junglefish, Aug 29 2005]
[link]
|
| |
Hey Doc, those pictures don't seem to be of a real product. They are Photoshopped from two seperate images, and sloppily too. |
|
| |
See Image #1 and #4, where the seams and creases of the supposed prints overlap the purses in front of them. And that last one is just obvious. |
|
| |
It's too bad, too. The artists did a good job of lining up all the, ahem, parts, they just didn't bother to make a good edge around the fade... |
|
| |
junglefish, I think you need to reread the caption on the photos. |
|
| |
edit: ah yes I see now what you mean. |
|
| |
You are right, [junglefish]. A fake! But a fine fake. |
|
| |
Yes, a couple of them are very fine indeed! :) |
|
| |
The angle of viewing would not always line up perfectly with the camera angle as it did, either.
They had me fooled until I read the other annos.
No need for tickets to Tokyo, then. It would have been worth the laughs the memory would always conjure up. |
|
| |
Once this would become widespread enough you could just stop using none-derwear and no one would know any better. |
|
| |
"I swear - that's not mine, I bought it at the store yesterday" |
|
| |
Hmm .. I like this more and more ... can I give multiple cruisants or something? :-) |
|
| |
... Because this idea makes it easy to know which underwear is mine and which one is my wife's ... |
|
| |
Though to really shock people you could switch. |
|
| |
HAHA! I was waffling about bunning this, but [World]'s comment pushed me off the fence. [+]! |
|
| |
Croissant for the phrase "barenaked gentle regions". Splendid. |
|
| |
Pity poor BUNGCO - spending all day pondering people with no nethergarb straddling horns would make anyone shed a tear. |
|
| |