h a l f b a k e r yThis would work fine, except in terms of success.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
How is this supposed to work? |
|
|
(See also a certain Calvin &
Hobbes strip.) |
|
|
Maybe you already see in negative vision compared with
the rest of us. You'd never know the difference. |
|
|
There have been experiments done with things like prisms to turn your view upside down. Your eyes adjust eventually, and you see things normally...For some reason, though, a setup to see in negative colors one never really adjusts to. It seems to have something to do with the highlights/shadows being in wildly incorrect positions. I don't remember where I read it, it was either an old Omni or Discover magazine...It was done with a two camera/small monitor setup to give stereo vision. |
|
|
The dynamic range of the sensors would be all wrong, at the very least. Under very low light conditions, our eyes adapt via a number of techniques to become more sensitive. With negative vision, you'd need to somehow become very sensitive to slight variations in a uniformly bright field, and I'm pretty sure we're just physiologically incapable of that. |
|
|
this reminds me of an experiment some college did where they took students and made them wear glasses that flipped everything upside down afer 1 week they were able to adjust to daily living and after a couple weeks their minds had switched their vision processing to see things upright, for when they took the goggles off, they saw everything upside down again |
|
|
but unlike the kids' experiment the eyes probably wouldn't bother changing the colours back. |
|
| |