Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Veni, vidi, teenie weenie yellow polka dot bikini.

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                                     

Muslim health

Muslims and alcohol-free health
  (+4)
(+4)
  [vote for,
against]

Anti-alcohol organisations should be able to quote Muslims as being free from alcohol-related diseases because they must not drink the stuff. ... I have never seen any reference to the topic and a brief web search didn't reveal much. ... My halfbaked idea in the form of a question is, are Muslims overall, healthier than those of other belief systems because they don't drink alcohol?
rayfo, Apr 02 2001

Correlation between an Alchohol Aversion Drug use and myelin health http://www.lowdosen...exone.org/index.htm
Interesting that 3mg Revia daily fortifies the nervous system [reensure, Apr 02 2001]

Utah baby names. http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/3450/
So are you in here, [Afro]? [angel, Apr 02 2001, last modified Oct 21 2004]


Please log in.
If you're not logged in, you can see what this page looks like, but you will not be able to add anything.



Annotation:







       If you want to study the effects of the absence of X, you want all other factors to stay mostly the same. Going into a completely different culture is not a good first step.   

       How about Mormons?
jutta, Apr 02 2001
  

       Had that khat before...wiiiiide awake
thumbwax, Apr 02 2001
  

       Teetolaters, Nonsmokers, Nonsmoking Teetolaters, NonPork... gawd this could take forever to satisfy all the control group/freak requirements.
thumbwax, May 08 2001
  

       Thanks for staightening out my crooked thinking.
rayfo, May 16 2001
  

       Jutta- what do you mean "what about mormons?"
AfroAssault, Sep 05 2001
  

       Supposedly Mormons don't partake of drugs or alcohol. That means they don't drink booze and they don't drink Coke (caffine) and they don't take asprin and they don't smoke and the women don't wear pants, only dresses and skirts; and they believe in poligamy.   

       The only problem you have now is to find a sect of either group that is strict on these beliefs. I know several Mormons that smoke, drink, wear pants, do drugs, had premarital sex, had babies out of wedlock, etc etc etc. They were the proverbial "wild child," you think of it and one of these people have probably done it. Then again, I know a few Mormons that are strict on it, so maybe the control group and the test group could be in the same sect.
barnzenen, Sep 05 2001
  

       Yeah, I know about those crazy Mormons. How do I know? *BIG SHOCKER*

I am one (gasp!). I was just wondering what she was implying.

And as for polygamy: *BIG SHOCKER PT. 2: THE QUICKENING*
They don't believe in polygamy. That's past shit. People get booted for polygamy, so next time you hear about "mormon polygamy," remember that it isn't church practice these days.
AfroAssault, Sep 05 2001
  

       Wow...that is shocking. This is like the cliff-hanger season finale episode of Halfbakery or something. Can't wait for the season premiere.
PotatoStew, Sep 05 2001
  

       I knew that poligamy wasn't in practice in my area, but I thought they still condoned it in Salt Lake City. I am sorry if I offended you [Afro], I just showed my ignorance of yet another thing.
barnzenen, Sep 20 2001
  

       It is certainly true that populations which drink no alcohol, do not smoke, do not drink caffeine, etc., etc. have statistically lower rates of diseases causatively associated with these behaviors. That's kind of the definition of "causatively associated with", and as such it's a tautology. And as such, it's uninteresting.   

       A more interesting question might be, "Can we estimate the degree to which members of a restrictive religion adhere to their religion's restrictive rules, by measuring the statistical incidence of misbehavior-related diseases in that population, and comparing it to control groups of non-users and heavy users?" Which is, IMHO, a fascinating question indeed.   

       For example, let us take the restrictive rule "Do not have premarital sex." In a control group where no members have premarital sex, there will be precisely no premarital pregnancies. In a control group where all members have premarital sex, there will be at least some premarital pregnancies. Note that use of contraceptives is a serious confound to this. If you look at any particular Christian subgroup which forbids premarital sex, you will almost certainly find a non-zero rate of premarital pregnancy. Unfortuantely, the confound of contraceptive use prevents us from determining whether the Christians in question had a small amount of unprotected sex, or a large amount of protected sex.   

       Another, and possibly better, example would be cirrhosis of the liver. It is found almost exclusively in people who are long-term drinkers of alcohol, or who have hepatitis. Since hepatitis can be tested for, and thus removed as a confound, it is possible to test for cases of cirrhosis of the liver which result almost exclusively from alcohol abuse. Comparing cirrhosis rates in Mormons and non-Mormon Utahans (word check?) would be a reasonable rate of measuring, if not strict compliance with the Mormon alcohol rules, then at least the rate of alcoholism among Mormons.   

       So that's what I'd use this idea for: to spy statistically on the moral fiber of my better-than-thou neighbors. :-)
Meowse, Oct 09 2001
  

       word check - "Utahns." Very close.
AfroAssault, Oct 10 2001
  

       I will NEVER have one wife. Either zero, or two or more.
Amishman35, Apr 30 2002
  

       You rang, Utahn?
brewmaster, Apr 30 2002
  

       The standard way of taking an accurate measurement between two or more groups is to eliminate all differences between the control group and the test group that are likely to be statistically significant.   

       Corrections anyone?
haruka, Jul 03 2002
  

       I think it is a bit unfair to say "many Moslem populations use other drugs , such as opium and khat, which have their effects on the users' health" because it implies that the consumption of drugs in muslim countries is as culturally acceptable as the consumption of alcohol is in Western society, which is not the case.
Ludwig, Nov 27 2002
  

       My 'cultural misapprehension radar' is very sensitive I admit, I think maybe it was just the smell of generalisation coupled with the word moslem that set it off.   

       I agree wholeheartedly about the problem of encouraging people to admit their vices. One of my friends is a retired baker in Alexandria, he is a pillar of the community and has been to Mecca. He will never admit in public that he enjoys the odd apple soaked in whiskey.   

       Sadly the military regimes that govern most of the muslim world do not provide the ideal environment for objective (anonymous) research.
Ludwig, Nov 27 2002
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle