h a l f b a k e r yThe word "How?" springs to mind at this point.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
This multidisciplinary branch of science would focus on problems that need to be solved for a self-sustaining Mars colony. Such topics would be investigated as: (just add "on Mars" to the end of these)
* Materials science focused on finding alternative ways to make things using elements commonly found.
*
Civil engineering for segregating and maintaining interdependent cities.
* City planning.
* Long term effects of reproducing in reduced gravity.
* Whether it's possible to grow plants in extremely weak sunlight, or the minimum amount of artificial sunlight that's necessary for modern agriculture.
* Forms of government that work well when you absolutely, positively cannot afford a war.
* Arcology development.
These and many similar topics need to receive special attention as soon as possible if we are to see to fruition the dream of a multiplanitary species.
Rentishams Flenting Wax
http://www.rentishams.co.uk/
[Voice, Nov 10 2019]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
// absolutely, positively cannot afford a war. // |
|
| |
You can ALWAYS afford a war ; not necessarily one that anyone survives, but you can always afford one, albeit at a very high price. |
|
| |
War is, by definition, a negative -sum game. |
|
| |
Besides, what's wrong with the standard operational procedure of blundering into a difficult situation for complex and poorly -defined motives, then sorting it out as you go along and finally pretending that the outcome was planned from the beginning , to try and sustain the fuzzy pink bubble of self -deception you strive so hard for ? |
|
| |
If you believe you can't afford a war you've already lost. |
|
| |
But
with adequate self directed propaganda & deceit it's always
possible
to pretend you haven't because there 'wasn't one' .. allegedly. |
|
| |
<Notes that [Skewed] is progressing very nicely, and will soon be pulled across the Cynicism Event Horizon to the Dark Side/> |
|
| |
[Gazes @ the Cynicism Event Horizon] |
|
| |
[Grins happily as he
slides towards it with legs clasped around a nuke] |
|
| |
[Checks the timer & gives a cheery wave] |
|
| |
"On my way, with you soon" |
|
| |
"[Skewed], return to the bomb bay !" |
|
| |
I'm not sure what's new here other than the aggregation?
Going back even to Biosphere 2? |
|
| |
Well, the idea of working out the practicalities of having a limited nuclear war inside a camper van seems fairly innovative ... |
|
| |
A typical VW campervan could carry a driver, two passengers, and three W48 155mm nuclear artillery rounds without serious problems if the load is correctly distributed. Yes, they're heavy, but only about the size of a typical 9l water-filled fire extinguisher. |
|
| |
Some luggage might have to go on the roof rack, though. Hardly "peculiar" ... |
|
| |
The study of sustained high-voltage electric sparks. |
|
| |
Please, do try to keep up. |
|
| |
So you haven't seen my camper van then |
|
| |
You mean it doesn't have support brackets for carrying two tactical nuclear devices ? That certainly is a very strange campervan, by our standards. |
|
| |
No not that, I mean 'you haven't seen my camper van' have
you? |
|
| |
The ad hoc automation probably wasn't a good idea. |
|
| |
Particularly that
dodgy AI I got on the cheap, it identifies as a sheep now, must
have wandered off with a passing flock when I wasn't looking. |
|
| |
Don't tell us ... you got it from MaxCo, didn't you ? Suspiciously cheap, fancy coloured box, lots of exciting promises in the sales brochure ? |
|
| |
Does it run on hay, water and small pellets of compressed grass, and make a rattling, squeaking noise at night ? |
|
| |
What you have there is a hamster. A live hamster, in a box. Not "AI"; a hamster in a box. Don't feel bad, you're not the first to be taken in by him. |
|
| |
We knew it was going to be bad when MaxCo won the tender for the 737MAX flight control system upgrade with a ridiculously low bid. "Dual redundant control". Brilliant. What happens if you shut two squirrels up in a small box ? Yup. They fight. Eighty tonnes of jet aircraft, brought down by aggressive squirrels ... he blames it on "inappropriate maintenance procedures " .... |
|
| |
Shit. Don't tell me our marketing team has been squandering
money on a "sales brochure" again. |
|
| |
Just the one example that we saw; he did achieve quite a nice effect with the blend of wax crayon and felt tip marker. |
|
| |
But you could still see the "Rentishams" small print and disclaimer underneath. |
|
| |