h a l f b a k e r yStrap *this* to the back of your cat.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
I was thinking, since the inside of the tip of the condom and the outside of the shaft shouldn't ever come in contact, couldn't you have a chemical on the inside and a chemical on the outside that when they come in contact make a really bright and unusual color. Use safe chemicals obviously, make them
part of the lube formula or something.
The benefit is that if you see an odd color when you open the wrapper, you know not to use that one. Also, after the act, a glance would reasure that everything probably stayed intact, or otherwise alert you to the need for a morning after pill.
Los Alamos Laboratory
http://books.google...GTS0ADwpWQ#PPA65,M1
This is a Google Books link. This was solved with gloves, [mylodon, Jul 29 2008]
The Gates foundation may be interested
http://www.popsci.c...e-condoms-dont-suck
[theircompetitor, Mar 23 2013]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
The act of donning the condom could put one's fingers on the inside, and any subsequent touching of the condom or its destination could spread around the chemical, causing a false positive. |
|
| |
How about a chemical on the outside that colours when in contact with a specific molecule in semen .
I suppose sticky fingers would still apply . Maybe a certain quantity needed approach . |
|
| |
why not devise a better system to ensure proper quality before packing the condom in the wrapper!? |
|
| |
good one gomes. This makes sense. Using a component of the lube for the system makes sense too. I am not sure how many layers of rubber go into a condom. If there are 3, the central layer is the place to hide the chemicals. |
|
| |
Yay my first croissant! Yeah the idea of using something that changed colors in the presence of semen makes a lot of sense to me too. Good suggestion wjt. Maybe combining this with one of the other condom ideas would help with the 'sticky fingers' false positive issue by making it easier to put on correctly the first time without exposing the sides to each other. |
|
| |
//Yay my first croissant!// Wrong! Try croissant and a œ. [+] |
|
| |
Great annotations! What if it gets damaged during the act? Probably the best way would be to withdraw at regular intervals & check for the specific color. To hell with the frustration! |
|
| |
Using electrical resistance testing, alarms and lights can be triggered during a puncture of layered surfaces. See link. |
|
| |
Cool link mylodon, that could definitely be applied to this. Bringing the digital multimeter to bed with us might be less than sexy... (my opinion, but you can do whatever tickles your fancy) but it would sure serve the purpose of telling whether the condom was intact or not. Maybe a really tiny conformal flexible circuit in the base ring with a micro-battery and a micro-LED for red/green status indication. |
|
| |
(The circuit and micro-led idea spurs a random sub-idea, christmas tree light condoms, rave-condoms, disco-condoms....) |
|
| |
//Using electrical resistance testing, alarms and lights can be triggered during a puncture of layered surfaces. See link//
[mylodon] If you post the idea separately, you would get a [+] from me. |
|
| |
this is a great idea my only concern is isnt it hard to put a condom on without worrying about that dreaded green color |
|
| |
// isnt it hard to put a condom on without worrying about that dreaded green color // |
|
| |
Yeah I was wondering about the marketing aspect of this a little too, since users would associate this product with its failure case. I guess it should be marketed towards those who are worried more about the consequences of it failing, and this could actually be reassuring. I'm sure this isn't what most people want to be thinking about this when they're using a condom. |
|
| |
A leak detecting device inserted vaginally might be able to accommodate an LED and perhaps a small buzzer, and be re-usable. |
|
| |
How about a lubricant inside the condom which
reacts chemically with the normally acidic vaginal
fluids? It could produce a bright colour, a stinging
sensation, or a small explosion to alert the users to
the problem. |
|
| |
Seemingly a good idea except that many condoms already are outrageous colours, so the colours would have to be chosen carefully. ( I only know about the crazy colours because I work in a college health center and we give them out to the students.) just sayin' |
|
| |
//How about a chemical that causes a burning/itching sensation if it leaks/breaks? Seems a tad more apropos.
— 21 Quest, Mar 23 2013// |
|
| |
I was thinking the same thing. You could put a herpes culture between the layers. |
|
| |