h a l f b a k e r yWarm and Fussy
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Seems to me that the best way for tobacco companies to prevent a great deal of financial loss in the future is by hiding the data that looks bad.
The most obvious way to me is to start arranging "accidents" for smokers. In this way the number of deaths from smoking related deaths will go down and
the tobacco companies will face less likelihood of litigation.
With a such a large number of smokers, it will prove taxing to come up with enough plausible "accidental deaths", but with a....hang on..there seems to be two penguins operating a steam roller outside my win
doctor smoking
https://www.youtube...watch?v=gCMzjJjuxQI ...not to mention Fred Flintstone [not_morrison_rm, Feb 09 2017]
[link]
|
|
Not to worry, [not_morrison_rm] is simply pining for a Fjords (a new brand of cigarette I've just made-up for the purposes of this annotation) |
|
|
What I'd like to know is where did that [+] come from, in between edits... |
|
|
Curiously an orang-utan delivered a parcel a few minutes ago, I think it must be a clock as it seems to be ticki |
|
|
Killing your customers is seldom good business, yet so many... |
|
|
Adverts showing doctors merrily smoking away as they
operated on people would also help no end..... 'scalpel,
clamp, sponge, retractor, fag.....' (we call cigarettes fags,
for those who live in the colonies) |
|
|
//Killing your customers is seldom good business, yet so many... |
|
|
Yep, at about 1 billion smokers (apparently) you would need to have a pretty extensive war to even thin out the numbers. |
|
|
Those guys have so much money rolling in, there are large reserves set aside to deal with any problems. Bumping off some of your addicted customer base would be counter productive. |
|
| |