h a l f b a k e r yOh yeah? Well, eureka too.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
So these extreme pantaloons would have a tight waist,
extremely
baggy thighs and then get really tight below the knee so
that the
thigh part, which could be twice as long as regular
pants, would fall
over the knees like big shorts, so that the bottoms of the
pants
would just look like
a pair of leggings you were wearing
under the
pants. Or maybe it would look like you were wearing
pants under a
big skirt.
'U Can't Touch This', MC Hammer
https://www.youtube...watch?v=otCpCn0l4Wo
Pantaloons!? You can't handle pantaloons! [DrBob, Feb 20 2015]
Picture of Extreme Pantaloon Skirt
http://netfreedombl...antaloon-skirt.html
[JesusHChrist, Feb 23 2015]
[link]
|
| |
As [DrBob] suggests, stop. Hammer time. |
|
| |
Mr Creosote really wanted to lose weight. He had bought the EPs but Beaufort had not called with any certainty, for the walks he had planned. |
|
| |
That is an insightful annotation, [wjt], but
unfortunately not in this context. |
|
| |
If you really want to join the Mounties all you need to do is ask eh. |
|
| |
Take this evolution to the natural extreme: the
baggy is at the waistband and appears to be a skirt!
The benefit of this setup… yes, the benefit… give
me a second here…. |
|
| |