h a l f b a k e r yThis product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
An acoustical musical instrument such as a violin, a guitar, or a bell, or bagpipes, is a passive system in that the human input powers the system.
The human uses muscle power to input energy (in the form of scraping the bow, strumming the strings, swinging the bell, or squeezing the bagpipe)
Obviously
the human uses Skill and Technique to somehow modulate or control the input energy, but we are taking that as given here.
The physical structure of the instrument acts as a kind of tuned oscillator / radiator system which converts the human input energy into audio output in the form of sound waves.
People want LOUD instruments to make a LOT of NOISE. Usually this is done by taking the resultant (quiet) output of the physical instrument, and using a microphone/pickup to convert the acoustical output of the instrument into electric signals, which can be electrically amplified and then used to drive a loudspeaker system.
However I don't want to listen to a loudspeaker, I want to listen to a LOUD musical instrument.
Now the idea here is that we can make the instrument louder by adding more mechanical energy downstream of the human input but upstream of the soundwave radiance.
Proposed is some kind of electro mechanical stimulation system that fits into a stock acoustical instrument. The wire comes out of a suitable orifice (of the instrument, do keep up) e.g. the violin f-hole and is plugged into mains power. The human user stimulates the input components of the instrument (e.g. scrapes the bow along the string). the instrument starts to convert this input energy and modulate it into sound vibrations, which somehow kicks the electro-mechanical input device into action, reinforcing and enhancing the vibrations and producing a LOUD SOUND from the instrument.
I suggested electrical but I see no reason why a direct mechanical system should not work instead, perhaps powered by a steam engine or falling weight.
from [a1]'s link. Auxetophone cello
http://www.douglas-...tophone/cello-1.jpg after c.1906 I think. However you can see that this setup extracts the sound from the instrument's bridge and puts it through the auxetophone amplifier and the big exponential horn. What I am proposing here is to extract the sound from the bridge, mechanically amplify it, and feed it back itno the bridge feet so that the amplified sound drives the wooden cello body in the usual way but louder. [pocmloc, Mar 05 2024]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
|
Is this the Starship Trooper Exoskeleton Marching Band? |
|
|
Well technically exoskeletons are a separate and different idea, you could have a musician wearing an exoskeleton playing an un-augmented acoustic instrument. |
|
|
This is more like an insert which fits inside the instrument. An endo-blaster if you like. |
|
|
[a1] - no - the stroh violin does not amplify, because there is no energy input except for the human hand drawing the bow over the strings. It is just a more efficient transducer of that input energy into sound energy. |
|
|
This idea is specifically for a non-human injection of energy at some point in the acoustical pathway between human actuation and acoustic radiance |
|
|
//how it's powered, how it's gets activated, where it injects its power// |
|
|
Ah well you see those are the half of the idea that is missing. |
|
|
I think that different instruments would require a different approach. |
|
|
Consider the stroh violin because it is conceptually and mechanically very simple. |
|
|
The energy input comes from the human arm scraping the bow across the string. The bow sticks and slips, forcing the string to vibrate at its fundamental frequency. The vibrating string forces the bridge to vibrate. The bridge foot forces the wee membrane to vibrate. The membrane forces air in and out of the horn, which is the sound output we hear. |
|
|
Now it seems to me that a good place to inject energy would be in between the bridge foot and the membrane. So we lift the bridge foot a mm and insert our mechanical amplifier there. |
|
|
It could be electronic, sensing the vibration of the bridge foot, and using a feedback circuit to send a much higher amplifiction to the membrane. |
|
|
Or perhaps we could use compressed air and some kind of Auxetophone style valve. The bridge foot could operate the comb. I think it would be kind of cheating to send the output stream of compressed air straight down the horn, but it would be worth trying - I have never seen an Auxetophone-Stroh violin. To be stricter within the specifications of this idea we could use the output compressed air to drive the membrane through some kind of membrane-sided pressure chamber or piston kind of arrangement. |
|
|
Is there an advantage to this model over existing in-faucet heaters? |
|
|
Do you think Parsons asked that kind of question while trying to rig up the cello to the auxetophone horn? |
|
| |