h a l f b a k e r yContrary to popular belief
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
That way when I do a web search (ok, Google), I know if its
an article that I can actually read, or one that I'll have to
purchase.
Search will give true information about free, trial, paid
already, or demanding pay for webpage entry.
I'm finding it extremely exasperating doing web research,
and
getting to articles that I have to pay for, while most of the
info is out there free, and the paid articles are usually
useless.
[link]
|
| |
Google *used* to have a really useful feature where you could manually exclude a website from any future results. |
|
| |
It used to be handy when researching something, as you could exclude all the pay-for-nothing sites that did nothing except plagiarise wikipedia (if such a thing is possible) from clogging up your results. |
|
| |