h a l f b a k e r yWarm and Fussy
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Democracy is good, but will be far better filling all the ambit public and private of the representatives with cameras and mics. Then, you can watch the president's live channel, or the channel of the vice-minister of health, or the channel of the senator X.
Anyone at, let's say, two levels below
the president, plus parliament members, must resign their privacy before assume.
For state secrets meetings, a small room without monitoring system would be enough.
If a politician is catched doing something improper, the system will not warrant justice, but at less, some public disapointing.
Real democracy at a glance.
[link]
|
| |
The correct Answer to the classic Question, "Quis custodiet
ipsos custodes?" ("Who will watch the watchers?") is: |
|
| |
//The correct Answer to the classic Question, "Quis
custodiet ipsos custodes?" // is: "Why are you
speaking Latin? This is Milton Keynes." |
|
| |
[MaxwellBuchanan], that classic Question was originally
stated in Latin. That's why it is a CLASSIC Question! |
|
| |
You're onto something if celebrities play the role of politicians, providing nothing but political theatre for decisions which are strictly made by direct democracy. |
|
| |
Slightly like watching Charles fondle animals in Australia? |
|
| |
I never did! That sheep's a liar. |
|
| |
//"Why are you speaking Latin? This is Milton Keynes."// More like, "durrr, wot are you loik, nob" |
|
| |
//nancy piluso?//
Nop, I'm David. |
|
| |