h a l f b a k e r yIf ever there was a time we needed a bowlologist, it's now.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Or get an analysis of the version I'm looking at and each word or
phrase's original author with a link to that version.
World is ruled by Wikipedians!
https://en.wikipedi...kipedia:Wikipedians
They are everywhere [4and20, Aug 04 2021]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
how does the author of a word tell everyone else what the
word signifies? |
|
| |
There appears to have been a sea change in Wikipedian demographics. At one time the majority of major contributors were British, but now the highest percentage of (general?) contributors are living the U.S. Not especially well-educated either. I have wondered more than once if there is an Anglo bias to entries and whether the entries in other languages are written by foreigners or merely a form of translation. |
|
| |
I'm pretty sure some of the historical articles in English
have
been written by a native speakers of non-English
languages,
then translated into English, not vice versa. For example,
if
you look at Wikipedia articles in English about Mexican
history or Bolivarianism, I'm pretty sure at least some of
them were written by native Spanish speakers. However,
there does seem to be an Anglo bias to the extent that
the non-English entries about what should be universal
(not specifically Anglophone) matters often (not always)
seem shorter than the equivalent articles in English (so
not translations). |
|
| |
^ I have noticed that [paschute] never replies to
questions asked about his/her idea and would
fishbone for lack of interest in ones own idea. but i
won’t |
|
| |