h a l f b a k e r yIt's as much a hovercraft as a pancake is a waffle.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Seems awfully smart to me. Bun for you. |
|
|
However, since the weight difference between a giant bladder of water and the weights currently used might be significant enough to affect operation, I propose a slight addition to your idea. |
|
|
x = weight of existing system .. y = maximum weight which could be achieved by building a water bladder which filled all presently available space .. x-y=z .. z = weight of built-in concrete or steel plates. Overall, the machine would weigh much less if its stabilizing system was z instead of x. |
|
|
I will bun this one for the fact that it makes good sense. Although as much as I hate moving my washing machine I figure that the struggle is well worth having the concrete block underneath. I would feel more comfortable knowing that a concrete block is holding the machine in place rather than a bunch of honeycomb tanks sloshing the water around. |
|
|
I was just about to link "Washing Machine Ballast" but [CF] beat me to it. |
|
|
Actually, I don't understand the need for honeycomb design. Why not just fill the "bladder" completely. If there's no air in the system, it won't slosh. |
|
| |