h a l f b a k e r yI didn't say you were on to something, I said you were on something.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Rather than type in text messages into your mobile phone why not have a speech recognition software built into mobile phones. Then you can speak your text messages into your phone. It would save a lot of time!
SMS voice recognition
SMS_20voice_20recognition
[borisbarp, Jan 04 2008]
[link]
|
| |
Speaking in to a phone to make a text message seems to be one process too many. |
|
| |
I quite like this. A bun, as long as it didn't change my intended comment to "You ducking aunt" like my phone does at present. |
|
| |
// why not have a speech recognition software built into mobile phones |
|
| |
Because general-purpose speech recognition software still isn't good enough to do that reliably. |
|
| |
Why implement it as software when you can call someone to dictate it? |
|
| |
Could this be implemented for telegrams? |
|
| |
//general-purpose speech recognition
software still isn't good enough// Yes, but
it would be OK if, upon receipt, the
message were automatically converted
back to speech by a reciprocal piece of
software. Then "Hi Denise" becomes
texted as "Hide a neice", which is then
spoken as "Hi Denise". |
|
| |
Would it translate things into gibberish abbreviations which nobody over the age of 14 understands or write them out correctly with all the grammar and punctuation they deserves? |
|
| |
If general-purpose speech recognition software still isn't good enough to do that reliably then I suggest building in a fax machine to a mobile. One can then write a proper message with a pen. |
|
| |
//One can then write a proper message with a pen.// |
|
| |
Or with a stylus on a touch-screen. |
|
| |
//Why implement it as software when you can call someone to dictate it?// |
|
| |
You can be sure an SMS will be intelligable. Voicemails often sound garbled and if you are in a nightclub or something you might not be able to hear it anyway. |
|
| |
//general-purpose speech recognition software still isn't good enough to do that reliably// |
|
| |
It doesn't have to do it reliably. It just has to save a decent amount of finger work. As long as it is quicker to talk and edit than to type everything, this idea is good. |
|
| |