h a l f b a k e r yOn the one hand, true. On the other hand, bollocks.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
glass tunnels allowing those in vehicles to look at what's under the sea duing their journey by road or rail
[link]
|
|
I, too would rather take the raik, to avoid accidents caused by drivers goggling at the scenery. |
|
|
complete with fish viewing rest areas |
|
|
Are fish that interested in rest areas? |
|
|
glass enclosed rest areas for viewing sea-life |
|
|
How will you deal with air pressure, air exchange, condensation, land-slides, earthquakes, auto accidents, and mussle build-ups? |
|
|
tunnel is similular to walk-through aquiriums and seaworld |
|
|
I wonder why they didn't make the channel tunnel out of glass? |
|
|
There probably is a reason. Who knows? Crazy engineers. |
|
|
It's pretty dark and murky at the bottom of most oceans, what with all the constant rain of dead creatures floating down from higher up - in all but the most tropical of oceans. It wouldn't be long before the glass is coated with a murky layer consisting of fishbones, algae, the corpses of ex-plankton, old boots, pirate treasure - all the usual stuff - what would be needed is some kind of wiping device so that the view of the pitch-black depths could remain unobscured. |
|
|
But perhaps it would be nice to create an underwater network of interconnecting tubes to link up lands in a tropical archipelago - an area like the Caribbean would benefit massively* from land-connections between islands, and maybe even to the mainland. |
|
|
*actual benefits may not materialise |
|
|
Drive a BMW, it beats the bendz. |
|
| |