h a l f b a k e r ySugar and spice and unfettered insensibility.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
No, see, the real problem is not
the startup power consumption
(which can easily be shown is
negligible), but the fact that
vapor lamps (Na or Hg) require
~10 minutes to turn on, by which
time the car is long past. |
|
|
But hey, we all know it's high
time to replace these lights
should be replaced by
high-efficiency LEDs, anyway.
Besides, if they use LEDs, they
can switch the red/green/blue
elements independently for
holiday-themed street lighting
(red and green near Christmas,
orange on Halloween, pink on
Valentine's Day, etc). |
|
|
There was a nice idea in New Scientist a few years ago advocating powering street lights near stop signs and roundabouts (and other places where cars have to slow down) from massive inductance coils buried beneath the road. The back emf the motion of the cars would create would slow them down nicely and generate power for the lights. |
|
|
I tend to wander around in the dark, having extremely good night vision, and having rooms suddenly go "FOOM!" in my face while my eyes are adapted would shortly thereafter result in my having to buy a whole bunch of new lamps... |
|
|
Rather than motion detection, the idea might want to use heat. That way if a car stops or has an accident, the lights stay on. |
|
|
A well-designed system would sense your car's position and heading several blocks in advance, so that the lights would light up *before* you got within view of them, not as you got there. That would avoid the "FOOM!" effect -- drivers wouldn't be able to detect any difference from how the lights work now. |
|
|
Would you be able to sleep in a room which keeps being lit up by street lights? I think it would be very anoying... |
|
|
[dammit, I'm only two years too late, almost. First 'good' idea I get since finding HB too. :o\ ] |
|
|
...The only down side I can see is that the streetlights would need to be very sensitive so that they remain on if someone is stood still underneath one; else it would greatly improve the dramatics of being mugged (which'd at least give all parties a bigger adrenaline rush!): the mugger stands under a street light and waits until it goes off, then when an innocent
passer-by approaches, the mugger is suddenly spotlighted from behind/above as they jump onto their victim acompanied by this trully brilliant stage
lighting effect. |
|
|
People are always after a bigger thrill with life these days anyway, this would meet that new dimension in an ordinary walk at night. (In
winter). |
|
|
I once expereinced the opposite of this. As I was walking home, a number of sucessive streetlights went off as I approached and came on again as I walked away. Very Spooky so would be good to reverse the settings for Halloween. |
|
|
"Negotium perambulans in tenebris" ?? |
|
|
So when the lights go out suddenly like that does it go "MOOF"? Or does "FOOM" still apply? |
|
|
How about saving power by keeping just a small fraction of lights on and scanning these over the ground very rapidly like searchlights. If they are swept fast enough then we would have the impression of a well-lit street at only a fraction of the cost. |
|
|
If the street were lit for only half a microsecond instead of a full microsecond, wouldn't we perceive that as being half as well-lit? |
|
|
Flying on a clear night, one is rewarded with stunning views of the lit roads and highways below. Like strings of Christmas lights, the thoroughfares glow in white, amber and green, occasionally punctuated by the headlights of a car or truck that seems to crawl through the darkness. In spite of the radiant beauty, one is struck by the waste of energy caused by illuminating empty stretches. |
|
|
By utilizing motion sensors and communicating with their neighbors, streetlights need only be turned on for passing traffic. Only the lights by and in front of each moving vehicle need be lit, benefiting taxpayers and astronomers. Of course such lighting must be able to be turned on and off quickly, and the wear and energy required for switching should not cancel out the benefits...and uh...be sure to search before writing the idea. |
|
|
"No, see, the real problem is not the startup power consumption (which can easily be shown is negligible), but the fact that vapor lamps (Na or Hg) require ~10 minutes to turn on, by which time the car is long past." |
|
|
That's true - but those lamps are also designed to last years. For infrequent-use street lamps, why not just use halogen lamps? They also last through several years, and BWM suddenly has a hard-on for lamps of blinding intensity to be used as the standard driving lights. Widen the bowl of the reflector a little, and they'd work fine. |
|
| |