h a l f b a k e r yNot the Happy Cuddle Club.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
I'd like to see what would happen if people could only vote for or against halfbakery ideas.
Neutral Vote
Neutral_20Vote
My earlier request for an additional state in the voting. [st3f, Jan 24 2006]
[link]
|
| |
As far as I am aware, what you are
asking for is already the status
quo. People can only vote 'for' or
'against' halfbakery ideas. There is no
'neutral' vote. You can choose *not* to
vote
but that is not the same thing. (as far as
I am aware, the 'neutral' button simply
removes your earlier positive or
negative vote.) |
|
| |
...unless you are looking to force people
to vote. What would you do to
force them? Chain them
to
their keyboards until they vote? |
|
| |
Chains, my bakers got me locked up in chains
And they ain't the kind
that you can see
Woh, it's chains of love
got a hold on me, yeah |
|
| |
So far everyone feels emphatically neutral about this idea. |
|
| |
What happens if we dip this one in a alkaline solution? |
|
| |
Momentary confusion: for a seecond or so I thought you meant if people could *only* vote for or against halfbakery ideas. My first thought: who's going to do my shopping for me? |
|
| |
//I'd like to see what would happen if people could only vote for or against halfbakery ideas// |
|
| |
Like, no annotations, either? 'Twould certainly save some time ;) |
|
| |
So no 'unvote' button then? Sorry [shinobi], [-]. |
|
| |
I'm neutral on this one... |
|
| |
What vote position would be the default or pre-condition? |
|
| |
Maybe you have to vote before you can see the idea. |
|
| |