h a l f b a k e r yIf you can read this you are not following too closely.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Revolting people are often sprayed on with tear gas, but this
makes them more aggresive.
What if the tear-inducing gas was replaced by gas that
induced ejaculation...
Aggression would be lowered and the crowd would rush home
to change the underwear.
[link]
|
| |
First. How? Tear gas is an irritant that works on mucus
membranes. It never really penetrates the body, and it
has no neurological or systemic effects. |
|
| |
Inducing orgasm, even if such a drug exists, would require
fairly massive neurological effect. The problem with this
is that different people respond to differently to such
drugs. And even if the people don't have hugely different
reactions, the dosage is going to be critical. |
|
| |
This is why soporifics (sleepy or knockout gas) is used so
rarely. You're as likely to kill people as incapacitate
them. |
|
| |
sooo... wouldn't more people show up for riots ? |
|
| |
To revolt is not the same thing as being revolting, is it ? |
|
| |
And what about the non-ejaculators ? |
|
| |
Revolting people wear underwear? |
|
| |