h a l f b a k e r yYou think: Aha! We go: ha, ha.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
This "ceiling robot" (telemanipulator) would be remotely
controlled by poorly paid workers from elsewhere in the
world. It would have two grippers and some cameras and
would put dishes into a dishwasher, wipe counters, and so
forth. When leaving the kitchen all the owner would have to
do is
push a button.
edit: ver 1.01: fixed pedantry
error in line 1, description, and title.
edit: ver
1.02: fixed grammar error in summary.
ceiling robot
ceiling_20robot [Voice, Jan 15 2011]
[link]
|
|
//poorly paid workers from elsewhere in the world\\ what a terrible thing to say. |
|
|
Kitchen robots are awesome. I have 2 that cook food and one that does a great job washing dishes, and one that keeps food cool. |
|
|
This could be done for free by crowdsourcing. |
|
|
This is no more offensive than many well accepted situations in a modern industrial economy, simply more visible. |
|
|
Telemanipulator? The word is half Greek, half Latin. No
good can come of it. |
|
|
A Menial Turtle Op (anagram) |
|
|
Wonderful combination of technology and outsourcing to overcome the deficiencies of robotics. |
|
|
What you really need is a teleoperated humanoid robot that can be controlled remotely by people who are otherwise unskilled and need work. This seems more feasible in the foreseeable future than a fully autonomous household robot. |
|
|
The current drawback is that |
|
|
a) a full teleoperation system will need to be developed |
|
|
b) The control rig (and the robot) are likely to be orders of magnitude more expensive than hiring a full-time person in your current jurisdiction for years, with full benefits. But this is simply a technological hurdle that can be overcome.... |
|
|
I see this as the future of most manual labor jobs. The robots stay on-site and workers control them from home in shifts with auxilliary controlers on standby. |
|
|
24/7 labor. No over-time. No sick days. Nobody moves, nobody gets hurt. |
|
|
// workers control them from home in shifts // |
|
|
Shifts ? You mean like those long nightshirty-type things ? |
|
|
Would a Paisley-pattern dressing gown be OK ? |
|
|
Only if it's open in the back. |
|
| |