h a l f b a k e r yGood ideas at the time.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I think there is a reason they don't do that now with the radio tracked pucks(where do you think they get the stupid line Blue Line). Can you say sea sickness! |
|
|
So the camera would have to move at about 70-100 mph on a slap shot. I don't see how this would help the viewer at all. |
|
|
see link for details of Blue Halo(not drawn at all but digital) This came from the first Google hit when searching "Hockey Puck Tracking" Do some research next time. |
|
|
After some thought, this idea has nothing to do with that
blue halo thing. This would keep the camera focused on
the puck. I think you may have misunderstood. |
|
|
A lot of people seem to have skimmed the title, come to an
incorrect conclusion about the idea, and boned it on that
basis. I know that's how things are done around here but
perhaps a slower reading is justified in this case? |
|
|
^true, though the title seems pretty obvious. |
|
|
I'm not sure it would work: you'd definitely need some sort of fuzzy for a slapshot or you'd get seasick, but it'd be worth trying. |
|
|
I suppose that's preferable to other things you could do with a Sony AS15 action cam wriststrapped to your hand |
|
|
You know, with more deliberation, I think maybe I was wrong.
This idea probably does suck. |
|
| |