h a l f b a k e r yThink of it as a spell checker that insults you, as well.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
To attract visitors to an art gallery, the paintings are not hung on the walls, but are held by scantily clad or even nude models.
The paintings can be positioned and sized to obscure particular parts of the models' anatomy, or not, depending on the gallery owners preferences.
Recommended for collections
dull but morally improving paintings, which would otherwise struggle to draw a viable audience.
[link]
|
| |
Look at the Titians on that! |
|
| |
I read no mention of human... merely alluring models. They might work for peanuts. |
|
| |
How were the paintings? What paintings? |
|
| |
Please do not grope the paintings or anything else in the
gallery. |
|
| |
This Idea's title is simply wrong. Mere nudity (even gratuituous nudity) merely rates an "R". |
|
| |
I think the gallery can get the XXX rating at the very minimum by "spreading". |
|
| |
A hardercore version would have gloryholes cut into the canvasses such that wangs can dangle, interacting with both art and viewer in new and potentially dynamic ways, a high culture, low morals version of seaside entertainments of yore. |
|
| |
Pretty much the same actually just instead of seeing seamen on docks... |
|
| |
It's a good idea. Combining all these annos, one could have pictures held up by intricate model planes, cars, and other art works, so you can admire two works of art! |
|
| |
Very few cars are works of art, sadly. Most of those
that are deemed "works of art" are noisy, smelly,
cantankerous old buckets of bolts, held together
with the determination of bumbling farts in tweed
jackets and the liberal application of spit and polish. |
|
| |