h a l f b a k e r yBirth of a Notion.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
In the search for ever-kinkier, extreme, in-your-face thrills, I propose x-ray depictions of people posed provocatively or engaged in sexual acts. Such depictions would provide extra stimulation for the jaded and weary pornography consumers who have seen it all before
"Magnetic resonance imaging of male and female genitals during coitus and female sexual arousal"
http://www.bmj.com/.../full/319/7225/1596
...as published in the highly respected British Medical Journal. Very interesting reading. [hippo, Sep 04 2001, last modified Oct 21 2004]
(?) The Operation
http://www.strokema.../6-98/operation.php
Infrared porn "independent film" (which I managed to find a copy of...) [omegatron, Aug 06 2006]
(???) X-ray porn
http://www.georgeto...ge-Library/Delvoye/
Delvoye's X-ray porn images [omegatron, Aug 06 2006]
(?) Review, background on Wim Delvoye
http://www.speronew...ord.html?record=192
The conceptual artist behind the X-ray images above. [jutta, Aug 06 2006]
[link]
|
| |
Pornstar dies of radiation poisoning. |
|
| |
Hottest teen gall bladders and lower intestines on the net - CLICK HERE! |
|
| |
It's funny that you should link to the BMJ, hippo. I was going to mention that one of my mates swears by the Medical Press as the most reliable source of pornography.
I try not to sit too close to him when he mounts
<cough!> that particular hobby horse. |
|
| |
They allude in the paper to 'performance' problems -
"Eight women had a complete sexual response during
sexual stimulation (experiments 4-11) and these women
described their orgasm as 'superficial.'" - probably
something to do with being inside a scanner and having
lots of people watching... |
|
| |
I must have pioneered this - women have always seen through me. |
|
| |
X-ray images are produced by radiation photons interacting with human tissue. The emergent beam is differentially attenuated according to the type of tissue it passes through. Bone attenuates the beam much more than soft structures (liver, kidney, dangly appendages - soft or otherwise). It is this attenuation which gives the resultant image contrast and density. I'm afraid if you tried to produce an X-ray image of a man and woman doing what comes naturally, all you would get would be a picture of two pelvises (pelves ?). However, I have in my collection (for teaching purposes you understand) many X-ray images of foreign objects which have been inserted into various orifices. There is a webite somewhere which shows work of a similar nature. |
|
| |
[UnaBubba] Ha Ha Ha.
[pussygalore] That's why I was advocating MRI -a more
subtle scanning technology. See link. |
|
| |
hippo...MRI does not use X-radiation, it uses a magnet and radio waves. Perhaps your title should read "magnetic Pornography"? |
|
| |
CAT scan seems appropriate seeing as how it's about some small cuddly furry domesticated animal |
|
| |
[pussygalore] It's [snarfguy]'s idea, not mine. |
|
| |
pussygalore: I understand your point, but the idea was for x-ray pornography, not MRI pornography. |
|
| |
Peter, that picture is phony. The story may not be, but I think it is from the tone...I've seen it on websites before. <Along with real ones...> |
|
| |
The MRI article says the idea originally came from seeing a scan of someone's throat and head while vocalizing a certain sound. Of course, this suggests a further possibility...could MRI analysis help us understand the techniques behind successful "deep-throating" and make it more widely available? |
|
| |
//dies of radiation poisoning//
As I understand it overexposure to X-rays causes you to die of cancer, not radiation poisoning. Radiation poisoning comes from radioactive substances which have toxic effects. Radiation from particles causes cancer. |
|
| |
I've seen this in the last 2-3 days. There was a x-ray image taken of a person sucking . . . well, take your pick of male appendages. . . another. They call it art, not pornography. |
|
| |
Picture Link: "This is a picture of two skeletons standing close to one another, can you guess what they are really doing with their flesh and blood? CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT" |
|
| |
This, believe it or not, is baked. |
|
| |
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/319/7225/1596/F3 |
|
| |
Caution, the link's explicit (Uh, sort of. If you're a skeleton I guess.) |
|
| |
There's a link function up above that allows you to insert a functioning hyperlink. You can edit your annotation and move the link. |
|
| |
+ It was a good idea, you may
want
to do some other frequency of
waves like gamma ray porn or
something like that. It could be
porn photography and birth
control at the same time. |
|
| |
I also saw a picture of a rather rotund man photographed by terahertz radiation, which allows you to see through clothing... I can't find it now, though. |
|
| |
I'm not entirely sure why you would want to. |
|
| |