h a l f b a k e r yThis is what happens when one confuses "random" with "profound."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
So many great annos pop up on occasion, whether modifications to original ideas, or closely related spin-offs, that I for one would love to be able to vote on them. Also, there are completely horrible ones at times.
Now, with my ideas, I can delete any COMPLETELY unacceptable ones, but I would
really rather not do that, and I can't do that for others' ideas.
However, a voting system for annotations would give an idea of the public consensus on annos, and thus give the baker incentive to remove the ones that are generally agreed to be Bad Things.
It could be exactly like the invention voting system. No big changes in the function, only in the medium.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
The focus should remain upon the poster rather than annotater. |
|
| |
I also think it'd be a mess depending on the granularity of the anno vote reports. |
|
| |