h a l f b a k e r yGo ahead. Stick a fork in it.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
From my eight year old -- an underwater space station. Basically a blob of
water
in space with a space station in the center. The outside would freeze solid and
the inside would remain melted. A good source of water, self-healing
(refreezing) if
it was hit by a meteor, protection from cosmic
radiation. Plus you could swim
around and maintain the space station in scuba gear instead of a full blown
space
suit -- and no worries about floating away because the water gives you the
ability
to swim in any direction without thrusters. The more I think about it, the better I
like it.
comets
https://en.wikipedi.../wiki/Comet_nucleus
[Voice, Mar 29 2014]
Shameless self-promotion, reminded me of this...
Low_20budget_20spacecraft
[normzone, Mar 31 2014]
Also reminds me of
Space_20Jam
More shameless self promotion [RayfordSteele, Apr 02 2014]
Methane airplane
http://spinoff.nasa...ne-Powered+Airplane
[RayfordSteele, Apr 02 2014]
Oil and Water in Zero G
http://www.our-spac...er/liquids-in-space
[MisterQED, Apr 04 2014]
Planequarium
Planequarium
[theircompetitor, May 21 2014]
[link]
|
| |
I was thinking maybe you could put algae in the blob for CO2 recycling, but you'd lose other gases along the way, outgassing. |
|
| |
I think the biggest problem you'd have with an uncontained blob of even ice would be the tendency to vaporise. I suppose comets keep most of their ice, so maybe this is too long term to be of concern. |
|
| |
Also it would probably cost a pretty penny to transport so much water into orbit. |
|
| |
Your kid has a great imagination. Cultivate it. [+] |
|
| |
And welcome to the 'bakery. This idea will generate a long
anno stream, because it's very nearly possible and that
starts everyone thinking. |
|
| |
Welcome to the Halfbakery, [terryo]. You'll feel
more comfortable when you accept that there's no
way out. |
|
| |
[+] good one, 'grats your kid. Warmth from the space station would keep the water nearest it liquid. |
|
| |
Welcome.
Love this idea. Very Niven-esque.
The Integral Kelp. |
|
| |
As long as you're okay with various rocks and gasses
in your living quarters there's no need to ship water
into orbit... (link) |
|
| |
If you're going to put in in earth (or earth's) orbit,
you're probably going to need a sun-shade on one
side, and lots of radiators on the other, possibly a
heat pump or two to keep the shell frozen and
the center livable. Put solar panels on the
sunshade to make a virtue of necessity. |
|
| |
It's only going to work outside of the Roche limit,
and ideally, you'd want it to be large enough to
maintain it's shape through gravity, which is fairly
massive (I'm honestly not quite sure how massive,
Ceres is mostly water and manages it at ~10^21 kg,
but Hygiea manages it at ~10^20kg and is rocky and
which suggests it might be much lower for water.
You're probably still looking to slam together
several comet nuclei for that effect. |
|
| |
Otherwise, you're probably looking at putting a
skin around the ice to keep from to much being
lost to micro-meteor ablation and the like. |
|
| |
All that being said, I like the concept. Welcome
to both you and the young-un. |
|
| |
It's going to need to freeze solid during any course corrections. |
|
| |
This is great. A few feet of water is an excellent
radiation shield, water is a whole lot easier to swim
around in than space. It is a phenomenal heat sink.
You can even engineer it really easily... making bit
frozen projections with a liquid core if you needed
more heat sink area. |
|
| |
My [+] is contingent on there being goldfish. Like
canaries down mines, they could alert the
astronauts to potential disasters, such as extremes
of temperature, increased radiation levels, or a
malfunction in the sunken treasure chest that
releases bubbles. |
|
| |
But.... how would they float on their sides at the
top? Which way is up? |
|
| |
"Up", for a goldfish, is towards its dorsal fin. I would
have expected anyone to know that. |
|
| |
Dibs on the Zamboni contract. |
|
| |
[Max] The only one true way out is through the mind . This could definitely be a stepping stone. [terryo] you must be full of pride, I would be. |
|
| |
This Idea has a problem known as "sublimation".
Things near the Earth (and Mars) receive enough
sunlight that ice will evaporate, and then be carried
off by the Solar Wind. Your block of ice will need to
be protected from sublimation, if it is any closer to
the Sun than, say, the Asteroid belt. |
|
| |
You'd want to start off with a plastic bag covering it, or you'd waste water waiting for the outside surface to freeze. |
|
| |
So... what happens when it's hit by a ball bearing at 75,000mph ? |
|
| |
"I was born in a water moon. Some people, especially its inhabitants, called it a planet, but as it was only a little over two hundred kilometres in diameter, 'moon' seems the more accurate term....." RIP |
|
| |
I think a blob of water in space would boil off due to near-vacuum pressure, no? |
|
| |
Could this not be done with jelly? |
|
| |
Sublimation is only an issue if the mass isn't
sufficient to retain the vapor by gravity. If it is, it
will sublimate until the partial pressure of water
vapor around the sphere is sufficient to prevent
further evaporation. |
|
| |
If it isn't, see my above on recommending a thin
skin. |
|
| |
You realize this is another reason to hollow out the moon. |
|
| |
I'm stll all mathed out from black body stuff, or I'd try to run up some figures on this, but I don't think sublimation is going to be a big problem if you keep the ice smooth (ie: transparent). |
|
| |
/course correction/
Why would it need to be solid during course
corrections, WcW? Would an engine or tug on the
outer shell not suffice? |
|
| |
This does have the smell of High SF about it.
not_morrison, what is that water moon quote from?
Is that David Brin? Startide Rising? |
|
| |
bungston - The Algebraist. |
|
| |
Not as in bungston, the algebraist. Unless you are good at algebra..in which case...oh, I give up... |
|
| |
[Vernon] you may be right about the sublimation rate, at least according to a graph I found... if the sphere was a black body, then orbiting around the Earth it'd equilibriate at about -20C, at which point the sublimation would be measured in cm of depth per hour. Ouch. |
|
| |
But it's not a black body. It doesn't absorb all the radiation thrown at it. Getting the temp down to -70 or 80 and you're talking 1cm every 10,000 hours or so. |
|
| |
Very imaginative idea. And, welcome. |
|
| |
I like this. It's one of those ideas you could easily discount for boring practical reasons - but then you can think - unless... |
|
| |
Suppose we coated it with a thin film of something to prevent water loss. Ideally self-healing, but at least not something which would tear when punctured. If it's frozen, then a layer of paint might do - and you can then just repeat the process every now and then, or patch any cracks. |
|
| |
You'd need at least one robust entry/exit portal. Two or more would probably be best, for efficiency, redundancy and safety. Then we could have a hollow core, connecting at two poles. Larger ships could then fly through without having to turn round. |
|
| |
You might also want to put up solar panels on the sunside. This would get that external temperature down, and you can use the joules in the middle to keep the living space temperature up as a side-product of doing useful work. |
|
| |
[+] Yes, and I see this grabbing comets that pass by,
to cultivate the required mass, & then some. |
|
| |
If it was gathering comets to help sustain the gravity
& water required, then why stop there? Just keep
harvesting & grow this puppy into another moon, but
this time, controlled. |
|
| |
Only problem I can see with the comet-grabbing idea is that if you grab a comet, it grabs you. You'd have to have a way getting your target comet to steer itself in a favorable direction, otherwise the "new neighbour" might drag you off to some destination neither of you would survive. |
|
| |
[skoo] yes, the pesky momentum problem. But,
that could be solved by tracking 1,000's of comets, &
then tweaking their trajectories (via small remote
probes) to make sure they collide at the same time,
from opposite directions, with comets of the same
mass. All quite doable, of course. |
|
| |
Wow. Thanks for all of the interest. I AM proud of that little guy -- he
has a lot of ideas, some really interesting (immediately after thinking
about this he "upgraded" to an under-LAVA space station so he kind of
jumped the shark there ... then there was the cow-powered airplane
that shoots cows out of the back for propulsion with giant trampolines
to catch them aaaand the conveyor belt that shoots the cows is
powered by ocelots!) |
|
| |
Maybe a layer of oil on the outside would prevent sublimation. And also keep it from freezing? I want the manta ray spacefarers to be able to jump out into bare space and land back in the water. |
|
| |
This whole idea reminds me of a scifi short that I read in a
compilation; different premise, yet parallel notions. I'll try
to find it. |
|
| |
Anything to do with Blue Champagne, John Varley? |
|
| |
...cow-powered airplane... would he settle for a cow
poo powered airplane? |
|
| |
^^ No, but it has the left-field feel of Varley's best work. |
|
| |
I don't think cows shoot them out fast enough to power a plane. |
|
| |
And now for some reason (or non-reason, more likely) I now suddenly remember that a cow once stood on my foot. She was a Friesland, and was just the last part of a chain reaction caused by one of her sisters getting spooked by her food crib. |
|
| |
When a cow stands on your foot, there's nowhere to run to. You just stand there discovering what an expressive face you have when it comes to expressing pain. |
|
| |
Perhaps if you spooked the cows they'd fire out their cow pats at a higher speed? |
|
| |
I've got my eye on the Jersey up the road ... oops, wrong online community! I mean ... |
|
| |
hng .. grng .. er later ... |
|
| |
I had a Clydsedale do that to me on purpose once. Ornery bastard. You're right, there is really very little to be done about it. |
|
| |
Avoiding barnyards is a step in the right direction. |
|
| |
That's what I was trying to explain to the Clydesdale. |
|
| |
At least the cow did it accidentally. And at least a cow weighs only about 500 kg if she's huge. I thought Clydesdales were gentle beings. I'll watch myself next time I'm around one. (I know you have to be careful of palfreys, because often they bite, but I thought one could always trust a heavy horse.) |
|
| |
The police heavy horses are trained to lean against the perps they run down, apparently. It requires a wall to work with, but there are plenty of those around. |
|
| |
Cudos (+) (terryo) Jr. for the idea. I agree with
(Loris) this is one of those ideas that you immediately
dismiss and then think but...
I originally came up with the same result as
(bungston) and thought oil film skin but that won't
work (link). Maybe ferrofluid? |
|
| |
//Cudos (+) (terryo) Jr. for the idea.// I think you
mean "kudos". |
|
| |
"Cudos" is either Latin for "mint", Lithuanian for
"marvel" or Sao Paulo
street-slang for "testicles". |
|
| |
//oil film skin but that won't work// |
|
| |
If your puddle is large enough to hold together under
it's own gravity, it will work, albeit very slowly. |
|
| |
Having the perimeter bound by phospholipid bilayers
has a nice feel to it.. |
|
| |
I just realized that floating around in water would
(pretty much) negate the effects of extreme
acceleration. Unless I'm wrong. Which happens. My
thinking is that the body is WAAAY closer to water in
density to water than air and a little acceleration
would only pull the lungs one way, and the bones the
other a little bit.... |
|
| |
/Cudos" is either Latin for "mint", Lithuanian for "marvel" or Sao Paulo street-slang for "testicles"./ |
|
| |
Or in my case, all three. |
|
| |