h a l f b a k e r yThere's no money in it.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
A 1-300? list of Rankings based on performance in certain criteria for use of the world populace as a reference point when determining change of thier own country's leadership.
example: "Bush has fallen to 186?, Holy smokes!, Sadam Hussien himself was 223 wasn't he?"
I have not come up with a complete
list of criteria for the rankings, but it could include such things as:
-Human Rights, Mean Economic Well Being of Populace, UN compliance, National Aggression Index, Foriegn Aid, and Environmental Issues.
World Leaders
http://www.google.c...Leaders&btnG=Search
Unranked [dpsyplc, Oct 05 2004]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
With numerous elections, the list would never be stable. Where does a new president enter the list? |
|
| |
Perhaps a new leader would be listed as NR until they actually did something or enough time had elapsed of them not doing something to quantify their efforts. |
|
| |
How the heck do you calculate the National Aggression Index? |
|
| |
Due differences in cultural values around the world I am dubious that the index would have much value as a global metric. |
|
| |
It would certainly tell who was popular. |
|
| |
I think it should be the countries rated
rather than the leaders, to deal with the
changing faces of govt. |
|
| |
There could be different events, so the
US could win events like "most english
speakers" and australia could get
"longest coastline" and so on. |
|
| |
Actually, I believe India would win "Most English speakers" hands down. |
|
| |
How would the US react to shock results like most likely to vote against green issues for example? |
|
| |
Zimmy suspect this would be best as a system used every year of the leaders tenure. would allow a new leader a year to distance themselves from bad decisions or reinforce their good standing. |
|
| |
Good concept, generally. Although some bugs to work out. How to collect data? I don't think random sampling by pollsters would work in oppressed regimes. People would be too skeptical of implications to truthfully be critical. (e.g., Saddam Hussien was recently reelected in a landslide. Did his people really love him that much?) |
|
| |
That Saddam Hussien election could have been as free and fair as let me think Florida?? |
|
| |
Granted, [engineer1], neither election was free and fair, but the results from Florida differ from Iraq. Saddam Hussien was elected by a landslide. George Dubya was elected by a mere chadslide. |
|
| |
Why not just continue with the current system. The Americans say they are number one in everything and the rest of us just nod and continue not to care! |
|
| |