h a l f b a k e r yWhat was the question again?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
yes if there's anyone I want in charge of caring for my little bundle of
mayhem it's unvetted strangers who want to travel free. |
|
|
They're probably the safest option by far. |
|
|
The likelyhood of a random stranger harming a child unknown to
them is vanishingly small. |
|
|
This excludes individuals who are intentionally seeking children, of
course. But if you want to protect children from harm, warn them
against (1) their parents, (2) their siblings and other immediate family
in the household, and (3) family friends and more distant relatives. |
|
|
The vast majority of children who are harmed or abused are well-
known to the perpetrator. |
|
|
As for the idea, it could be vastly improved by offering (for a modest
premium) single rather than return tickets. We understand that
Caithness and Wick can be quite pleasant in this season. |
|
|
You forgot (4) living in Arkansas |
|
|
...or indeed Norfolk. (A Norfolk virgin: an ugly 10-
year old who can run faster than her brother.) |
|
|
Tautology: it is not possible to live in Arkansas. |
|
|
It IS possible to exist in Arkansas, but if you want to live, you have to
go somewhere else (Little Rock AFB, dear God what an awful place,
never again) <wanders away, shaking head and mumbling, in search
of strong drink> |
|
|
//if you want to protect children from harm, warn them against (1) their parents, (2) their siblings and other immediate family in the household, and (3) family friends and more distant relatives.// |
|
|
Indeed, any establishment... harsh that. |
|
| |